Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon Metabolism and Transport in Arbuscular Mycorrhizas

Bago, Berta, Pfeffer, Philip E., Shachar-Hill, Yair·2000·Plant Physiology
DOI 10.1104/pp.124.3.949
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Colonization of the land by plants some 400 million years ago was associated with the colonization of their primitive roots by soil-borne filamentous fungi (Nicolson, 1975;Simon et al., 1993; Taylor et al., 1995). Today, 90% to 95% of land plants still maintain some type of mycorrhizal association so that “mycorrhizas, not roots, are the chief organs of nutrient uptake by land plants” (Smith and Read, 1997). Of the several mycorrhizal symbioses, arbuscular mycorrhizas are much the most abundant. These are formed by a very wide variety of host plants (including angiosperms, gymnosperms, pteridophytes, and some mosses, lycopods, and psilotales) and a comparatively small group of aseptate filamentous fungi, the Glomales. The study of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi has fundamental and practical importance. First because in most environments “root biology” is actually “mycorrhizal biology”, and second because of the practical importance of AM in fields as diverse as sustainable agriculture, horticulture, reforestation, and ecosystem management (Bethlenfalvay and Schüepp, 1994; Barea and Jeffries, 1995). There have been a number of reviews and at least one excellent text (Smith and Read, 1997) in recent years covering various aspects of the AM symbiosis. These include: development and morphology (Smith and Smith, 1997; Barker et al., 1998; Azcón-Aguilar et al., 1999;Bago, 2000), molecular and cellular biology (Gianinazzi-Pearson et al., 1995; Harrison, 1999), and physiology and nutrient transfer at symbiotic interfaces (Cooper, 1984; Smith and Smith, 1990; Koide and Schreiner, 1992; Azcón-Aguilar and Bago, 1994; George et al., 1995; Jakobsen, 1999). A current resource on mycorrhizal research worldwide is maintained at www.mycorrhiza.ag.utk.edu. Here we review the biochemistry of carbon metabolism and transport in the AM symbiosis. Progress in this area has been significant thanks to the use in recent years of diverse methods including molecular biology, cytology, in vitro AM cultures, microscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance (Bago et al., 2000).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1104/pp.124.3.949

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 600

Metadata

Authors
Bago, B., Pfeffer, P. E., & Shachar-Hill, Y.
Venue
Plant Physiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2000-11-01
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
949-958
ISSN
  • 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2548
DOI
10.1104/pp.124.3.949
OpenAlex
W2066143684
Cited by
600
References
36
FWCI
19.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.