The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic and Physical Control of Cell Elongation Rate: In Vivo Studies in Nitella
Open accessAbstract
Several levels of control of elongation rate are revealed through the detailed study of responses of the Nitella internode to abrupt shifts in turgor. The immediate response, which apparently reflects the physical state of the cell, is approximately described by the equation r = (P - Y)m where r is rate, P is pressure, Y is the wall's yielding threshold, and m is related to the wall's apparent fluidity (reciprocal viscosity). Because P and Y are in the range 5 to 6 atmospheres, and (P - Y) is roughly 0.2 atmosphere, elongation rate is initially extremely sensitive to changes in P. A small step-down in turgor (0.7 atmosphere) stops growth, and a similar rise greatly accelerates it. These initial responses are, however, soon (15 minutes) compensated by changes in Y. An apparent metabolism-dependent reaction (azide-sensitive) lowers Y; strain hardening (azide-insensitive) raises it. These two opposing processes, acting on Y, serve as a governor on (P - Y), tending to maintain it at a given value despite changes in P. This ability to compensate is itself a function of turgor. Turgor step-downs are less and less well compensated, leading to lower rate, as turgor falls from 5 atmospheres to about 2 atmospheres where growth appears not to resume. This is the lowest attainable yield value, Y(1). The turgor dependency of compensation reflects a turgor requirement of the Y-lowering ("wall-softening") process. Thus the relation between steady state, r(s), and turgor is an indirect one, derived from time-dependent alterations of the cell wall. This relationship superficially resembles the instantaneously valid one in that, roughly, r(s) = (P - Y(1))m(s). Y(1) and m(s), however, have much lower values than Y and m. The duality of the elongation rate versus turgor relation and the prominent role of Y in regulating rate are the major features of growth control in Nitella.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Antibiotic Resistance in a Bacterium with Suppressed Autolytic System
TOMASZ, A., ALBINO, A., & ZANATI, E. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/227138a0 · Cited by 429
RADIOAUTOGRAPHIC STUDY OF CELL WALL DEPOSITION IN GROWING PLANT CELLS
Ray, P. M. (1967) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.35.3.659 · Cited by 125
Kinetic experiments on the nature of the growth mechanism in oat coleoptile cells
Ray, P. M., & Ruesink, A. W. (1962) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(62)90049-0 · Cited by 121
Cited by
A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth
Hawkes, E. W., Blumenschein, L. H., Greer, J. D., & Okamura, A. M. (2017) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aan3028 · Cited by 968
Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants
Ashraf, M. (2004) · Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants · doi:10.1078/0367-2530-00165 · Cited by 842
Water stress, growth and osmotic adjustment
Hsiao, T. C., Acevedo, E., Fereres, E., & Henderson, D. W. (1976) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0026 · Cited by 687
Further Progress in Crop Water Relations
Turner, N. C. (1996) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60258-8 · Cited by 428
Crop Simulation Models in Agronomic Systems
Whisler, F. D., Acock, B., Baker, D. N., Fye, R. E., Hodges, H. F., Lambert, J. R., Lemmon, H. E., McKinion, J. M., & Reddy, V. R. (1986) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60282-5 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, P. B., Erickson, R. O., & Buggy, J.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1971-03-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-430
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W2010604768
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.