The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Study of Root Uptake and Xylem Translocation of Cinmethylin and Related Compounds in Detopped Soybean Roots Using a Pressure Chamber Technique
Open accessAbstract
A pressure chamber technique was used to study the root uptake and xylem translocation of nonradiolabeled cinmethylin and its analogs in detopped soybean (Glycine max) roots. Quantifications of compounds were achieved by gas chromatography analysis using a mass spectrometry detector under selected ion monitoring. The compounds tested, with octanol-water partition coefficients (log Kow values) ranging from 0.96 to 5.3, were all nonionizable under the experimental conditions. Root efflux curves of all compounds exhibited a steady-state kinetic profile. The time required to achieve the steady state efflux concentration in the xylem sap correlated with log Kow values in a manner very similar to the root binding profile reported previously by GG Briggs et al. ([1982] Pestic Sci 13: 495-504). After reaching the steady state efflux, the concentration ratio of each compound in the xylem sap to the final concentration in the pressure chamber was taken as the transpiration stream concentration factor (TSCF). A nonlinear relationship was observed between TSCF and log Kow values. The highest TSCF value was between 0.6 to 0.8 for compounds with log Kow between 2.5 to 3.5. The range of optimal log Kow values was slightly higher than that reported earlier by Briggs et al. ([1982] Pestic Sci 13: 495-504). After taking into account the binding of the compound to soil, the apparent optimal Kow value for best root-to-shoot translocation is lowered to around 1. The relationship of root-to-shoot and phloem translocation was also discussed to promote a better understanding at the whole plant level of the uptake and translocation of a soil-applied xenobiotic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Christou, A., Agüera, A., Bayona, J. M., Cytryn, E., Fotopoulos, V., Lambropoulou, D., Manaia, C. M., Michael, C., Revitt, M., Schröder, P., et al. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.004 · Cited by 590
Remediation of contaminated soils with green plants: An overview
Cunningham, S. D., & Berti, W. R. (1993) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/bf02632036 · Cited by 473
Insights into the Uptake Processes of Wastewater-Borne Pharmaceuticals by Vegetables
Goldstein, M., Shenker, M., & Chefetz, B. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5008615 · Cited by 340
Lombi, E., Zhao, F. J., McGrath, S. P., Young, S. D., & Sacchi, G. A. (2001) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00003.x · Cited by 268
Müller, C. E., LeFevre, G. H., Timofte, A. E., Hussain, F. A., Sattely, E. S., & Luthy, R. G. (2015) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.3251 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsu, F. C., Marxmiller, R. L., & Yang, A. Y. S.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-08-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1573-1578
- ISSN
- 0032-0889 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2548
- OpenAlex
- W1974205716
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of Root Uptake and Xylem Translocation of Cinmethylin and Related Compounds in Detopped Soybean Roots Using a Pressure Chamber Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1104/pp.93.4.1573
- The paper
- Hsu, F. C., Marxmiller, R. L., & Yang, A. Y. S. (1990). Study of Root Uptake and Xylem Translocation of Cinmethylin and Related Compounds in Detopped Soybean Roots Using a Pressure Chamber Technique. Plant Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.93.4.1573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.