Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 994

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Control of Flowering Time: Interacting Pathways as a Basis for Diversity

Open access
Mouradov, Aidyn, Cremer, Frédéric, Coupland, George·2002·The Plant Cell

Abstract

Flowering is controlled by environmental conditions and developmental regulation. The complexity of this regulation is created by an intricate network of signaling pathways. Arabidopsis is an excellent model system in which to approach this complexity, because it responds to many of the environmental conditions that control flowering in other species, and genetic tools are well developed. Studies in Arabidopsis have led to the identification of components within individual signaling pathways that affect flowering, and to their positioning within molecular hierarchies. Furthermore, distinct signaling pathways are known to converge on the activation of the same flowering-time genes. This convergence of pathways on a common set of genes may enable the integration of different responses, so that the plant can produce a coordinated flowering response under conditions in which multiple environmental parameters are changing simultaneously. Also, genetic analysis of Arabidopsis varieties showing natural variation in flowering time has demonstrated how the activity of these pathways can be altered in nature and how balancing the effects of different environmental stimuli on flowering time is important in plants adapting to growth in different geographical locations. At present, the full complexity of the flowering network can only be approached in Arabidopsis where the necessary tools are available, and extensive efforts are being made to describe related pathways. For example, photoreception, circadian clock regulation, growth regulator synthesis and response, chromatin structure, and response to low temperatures play important roles in flowering-time control and are studied extensively in Arabidopsis. Nevertheless, there is a need to understand how the full diversity in flowering responses is generated. For example, Arabidopsis responds to photoperiod, but all ecotypes are long-day plants that flower earlier under long than short days, whereas many other species show the reverse response. Also, all Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes are annual plants, and understanding the perennial habit will require a different model species. To understand the diversity in flowering responses, there is a need to look to other species, and here we compare detailed information from Arabidopsis with the emerging picture of the genetic control of flowering in short-day plants. The control of flowering has been reviewed frequently over the last few years (Koornneef et al., 1998b; Simpson et al., 1999; Reeves and Coupland, 2000; Samach and Coupland, 2000; Araki, 2001). However, progress has been rapid, and in the following review we emphasize results that have emerged recently. In particular, we summarize the current understanding of the signaling pathways involved in flowering control in Arabidopsis, and stress how alterations in the balance of activity between pathways can give rise to dramatically different flowering behaviors, for example between ecotypes. We also address recent progress in describing how these pathways function in species that show different responses to environmental conditions than does Arabidopsis. Signaling Pathways Involved in the Regulation of Flowering by Photoperiod in Arabidopsis. A diagram showing the putative relationships among genes involved in the photoperiod pathway. On the basis of the phenotypes of known mutants, genes shown in red generally repress flowering, whereas those in green promote it. Small upright arrows indicate the of the genes by in plants. between genes a whereas a and from the clock indicate that the of the is circadian clock to the clock indicate that the indicate that it between to the following which the in the et al., et al., and et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., 1999; et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., and et al., (Koornneef et al., et al., et al., Signaling Pathways Involved in the Regulation of Flowering by Photoperiod in Arabidopsis. A diagram showing the putative relationships among genes involved in the photoperiod pathway. On the basis of the phenotypes of known mutants, genes shown in red generally repress flowering, whereas those in green promote it. Small upright arrows indicate the of the genes by in plants. between genes a whereas a and from the clock indicate that the of the is circadian clock to the clock indicate that the indicate that it between to the following which the in the et al., et al., and et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., 1999; et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., et al., and et al., (Koornneef et al., et al., et al., the flowering-time of Arabidopsis, there is a that is flowering in long but to the under short are to and to a genetic that flowering in response to long and are

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.001362

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 994

Metadata

Authors
Mouradov, A., Cremer, F., & Coupland, G.
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2002-05
Volume
14
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
S111-S130
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2107032029
Cited by
994
References
0
FWCI
72.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of Flowering Time: Interacting Pathways as a Basis for Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.001362
The paper
Mouradov, A., Cremer, F., & Coupland, G. (2002). Control of Flowering Time: Interacting Pathways as a Basis for Diversity. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.001362

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.