The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Repair of Genomic Double-Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination between Directly Repeated Sequences in the Plant Genome
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies demonstrated that in somatic plant cells, homologous recombination (HR) is several orders of magnitude less efficient than nonhomologous end joining and that HR is little used for genomic double-strand break (DSB) repair. Here, we provide evidence that if genomic DSBs are induced in close proximity to homologous repeats, they can be repaired in up to one-third of cases by HR in transgenic tobacco. Our findings are relevant for the evolution of plant genomes because they indicate that sequences containing direct repeats such as retroelements might be less stable in plants that harbor active mobile elements than anticipated previously. Furthermore, our experimental setup enabled us to demonstrate that transgenic sequences flanked by sites of a rare cutting restriction enzyme can be excised efficiently from the genome of a higher eukaryote by HR as well as by nonhomologous end joining. This makes DSB-induced recombination an attractive alternative to the currently applied sequence-specific recombination systems used for genome manipulations, such as marker gene excision.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells
Liang, F., Han, M., Romanienko, P. J., & Jasin, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.5172 · Cited by 649
Recombination in the Plant Genome and its Application in Biotechnology
Vergunst, A. (1999) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0735-2689(99)00385-8 · Cited by 94
Cited by
The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution
Puchta, H. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri025 · Cited by 601
Self-citationSchiml, S., Fauser, F., & Puchta, H. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12704 · Cited by 342
Self-citationMeganucleases and DNA Double-Strand Break-Induced Recombination: Perspectives for Gene Therapy
Paques, F., & Duchateau, P. (2007) · Current Gene Therapy · doi:10.2174/156652307779940216 · Cited by 273
Kimura, S., & Sakaguchi, K. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040482n · Cited by 167
Multiplex genome-editing technologies for revolutionizing plant biology and crop improvement
Abdelrahman, M., Wei, Z., Rohila, J. S., & Zhao, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.721203 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Siebert, R., & Puchta, H.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-29
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1121-1131
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2120775449
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Repair of Genomic Double-Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination between Directly Repeated Sequences in the Plant Genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.001727
- The paper
- Siebert, R., & Puchta, H. (2002). Efficient Repair of Genomic Double-Strand Breaks by Homologous Recombination between Directly Repeated Sequences in the Plant Genome. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.001727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.