The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proteomic Analysis of the Eyespot of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Provides Novel Insights into Its Components and Tactic Movements
Open accessAbstract
Flagellate green algae have developed a visual system, the eyespot apparatus, which allows the cell to phototax. To further understand the molecular organization of the eyespot apparatus and the phototactic movement that is controlled by light and the circadian clock, a detailed understanding of all components of the eyespot apparatus is needed. We developed a procedure to purify the eyespot apparatus from the green model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Its proteomic analysis resulted in the identification of 202 different proteins with at least two different peptides (984 in total). These data provide new insights into structural components of the eyespot apparatus, photoreceptors, retina(l)-related proteins, members of putative signaling pathways for phototaxis and chemotaxis, and metabolic pathways within an algal visual system. In addition, we have performed a functional analysis of one of the identified putative components of the phototactic signaling pathway, casein kinase 1 (CK1). CK1 is also present in the flagella and thus is a promising candidate for controlling behavioral responses to light. We demonstrate that silencing CK1 by RNA interference reduces its level in both flagella and eyespot. In addition, we show that silencing of CK1 results in severe disturbances in hatching, flagellum formation, and circadian control of phototaxis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coordination of circadian timing in mammals
Reppert, S. M., & Weaver, D. R. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00965 · Cited by 4,379
Molecular Bases for Circadian Clocks
Dunlap, J. C. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80566-8 · Cited by 2,900
Cited by
Microbial Rhodopsins: Diversity, Mechanisms, and Optogenetic Applications
Govorunova, E. G., Sineshchekov, O. A., Li, H., & Spudich, J. L. (2017) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-101910-144233 · Cited by 363
Interplay of Circadian Clocks and Metabolic Rhythms
Wijnen, H., & Young, M. W. (2006) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090603 · Cited by 339
Metabolism of acyl‐lipids in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Li‐Beisson, Y., Beisson, F., & Riekhof, W. (2015) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12787 · Cited by 310
Omics approaches for microalgal applications: Prospects and challenges
Mishra, A., Medhi, K., Malaviya, P., & Thakur, I. S. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121890 · Cited by 141
Ueki, N., Matsunaga, S., Inouye, I., & Hallmann, A. (2010) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-103 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, M., Geßner, G., Luff, M., Heiland, I., Wagner, V., Kaminski, M., Geimer, S., Eitzinger, N., Reißenweber, T., Voytsekh, O., Fiedler, M., Mittag, M., & Kreimer, G.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-23
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1908-1930
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2145184244
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic Analysis of the Eyespot of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Provides Novel Insights into Its Components and Tactic Movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.106.041749
- The paper
- Schmidt, M., Geßner, G., Luff, M., Heiland, I., Wagner, V., Kaminski, M., Geimer, S., Eitzinger, N., Reißenweber, T., Voytsekh, O., Fiedler, M., Mittag, M., & Kreimer, G. (2006). Proteomic Analysis of the Eyespot of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Provides Novel Insights into Its Components and Tactic Movements. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.041749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.