The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shoot Na+ Exclusion and Increased Salinity Tolerance Engineered by Cell Type–Specific Alteration of Na+ Transport in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Soil salinity affects large areas of cultivated land, causing significant reductions in crop yield globally. The Na+ toxicity of many crop plants is correlated with overaccumulation of Na+ in the shoot. We have previously suggested that the engineering of Na+ exclusion from the shoot could be achieved through an alteration of plasma membrane Na+ transport processes in the root, if these alterations were cell type specific. Here, it is shown that expression of the Na+ transporter HKT1;1 in the mature root stele of Arabidopsis thaliana decreases Na+ accumulation in the shoot by 37 to 64%. The expression of HKT1;1 specifically in the mature root stele is achieved using an enhancer trap expression system for specific and strong overexpression. The effect in the shoot is caused by the increased influx, mediated by HKT1;1, of Na+ into stelar root cells, which is demonstrated in planta and leads to a reduction of root-to-shoot transfer of Na+. Plants with reduced shoot Na+ also have increased salinity tolerance. By contrast, plants constitutively expressing HKT1;1 driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter accumulated high shoot Na+ and grew poorly. Our results demonstrate that the modification of a specific Na+ transport process in specific cell types can reduce shoot Na+ accumulation, an important component of salinity tolerance of many higher plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Self-citation
Cited by
Comparative physiology of elemental distributions in plants
Conn, S., & Gilliham, M. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq027 · Cited by 344
Self-citationEngineering salinity tolerance in plants: progress and prospects
Wani, S. H., Kumar, V., Khare, T., Guddimalli, R., Parveda, M., Solymosi, K., Suprasanna, P., & Kavi Kishor, P. B. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03366-6 · Cited by 233
Improving crop salt tolerance using transgenic approaches: an update and physiological analysis
Kotula, L., Garcia Caparros, P., Zörb, C., Colmer, T. D., & Flowers, T. J. (2020) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.13865 · Cited by 125
Mapping of HKT1;5 Gene in Barley Using GWAS Approach and Its Implication in Salt Tolerance Mechanism
Hazzouri, K. M., Khraiwesh, B., Amiri, K. M. A., Pauli, D., Blake, T., Shahid, M., Mullath, S. K., Nelson, D., Mansour, A. L., Salehi-Ashtiani, K., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00156 · Cited by 91
Han, Y., Yin, S., Huang, L., Wu, X., Zeng, J., Liu, X., Qiu, L., Munns, R., Chen, Z.-H., & Zhang, G. (2018) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcy116 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Møller, I. S., Gilliham, M., Jha, D., Mayo, G. M., Roy, S. J., Coates, J. C., Haseloff, J., & Tester, M.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2163-2178
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2104909130
- Cited by
- 561
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.