Cited by 857Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design

Open access
Myles, Sean, Peiffer, Jason, Brown, Patrick J., Ersoz, Elhan S., Zhang, Zhiwu, Costich, Denise E., Buckler, Edward S.·2009·The Plant Cell

Abstract

The goal of many plant scientists' research is to explain natural phenotypic variation in terms of simple changes in DNA sequence. Traditionally, linkage mapping has been the most commonly employed method to reach this goal: experimental crosses are made to generate a family with known relatedness, and attempts are made to identify cosegregation of genetic markers and phenotypes within this family. In vertebrate systems, association mapping (also known as linkage disequilibrium mapping) is increasingly being adopted as the mapping method of choice. Association mapping involves searching for genotype-phenotype correlations in unrelated individuals and often is more rapid and cost-effective than traditional linkage mapping. We emphasize here that linkage and association mapping are complementary approaches and are more similar than is often assumed. Unlike in vertebrates, where controlled crosses can be expensive or impossible (e.g., in humans), the plant scientific community can exploit the advantages of both controlled crosses and association mapping to increase statistical power and mapping resolution. While the time and money required for the collection of genotype data were critical considerations in the past, the increasing availability of inexpensive DNA sequencing and genotyping methods should prompt researchers to shift their attention to experimental design. This review provides thoughts on finding the optimal experimental mix of association mapping using unrelated individuals and controlled crosses to identify the genes underlying phenotypic variation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1105/tpc.109.068437

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Myles, S., Peiffer, J., Brown, P. J., Ersoz, E. S., Zhang, Z., Costich, D. E., & Buckler, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
The Plant Cell
Published
2009-08
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
2194-2202
ISSN
  • 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-298X
OpenAlex
W2100082928
Cited by
857
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 58
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Plant Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
association mapping, linkage mapping, linkage disequilibrium, experimental design, plant genetics, genotype-phenotype correlation, statistical power, mapping resolution, genotyping, controlled crosses
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review