The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcription Dynamics in Plant Immunity
Open accessAbstract
Plant cells maintain sophisticated gene transcription programs to regulate their development, communication, and response to the environment. Environmental stress cues, such as pathogen encounter, lead to dramatic reprogramming of transcription to favor stress responses over normal cellular functions. Transcription reprogramming is conferred by the concerted action of myriad transcription (co)factors that function directly or indirectly to recruit or release RNA Polymerase II. To establish an effective defense response, cells require transcription (co)factors to deploy their activity rapidly, transiently, spatially, and hierarchically. Recent findings suggest that in plant immunity these requirements are met by posttranslational modifications that accurately regulate transcription (co)factor activity as well as by sequential pulse activation of specific gene transcription programs that provide feedback and feedforward properties to the defense gene network. Here, we integrate these recent findings from plant defense studies into the emerging field of transcription dynamics in eukaryotes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hayden, M. S., & Ghosh, S. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1228704 · Cited by 3,842
Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression
Nelson, D. E., Ihekwaba, A. E. C., Elliott, M., Johnson, J. R., Gibney, C. A., Foreman, B. E., Nelson, G., See, V., Horton, C. A., Spiller, D. G., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099962 · Cited by 1,186
Pulsatile Stimulation Determines Timing and Specificity of NF-κB-Dependent Transcription
Ashall, L., Horton, C. A., Nelson, D. E., Paszek, P., Harper, C. V., Sillitoe, K., Ryan, S., Spiller, D. G., Unitt, J. F., Broomhead, D. S., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164860 · Cited by 543
A Complex Oscillating Network of Signaling Genes Underlies the Mouse Segmentation Clock
Dequéant, M.-L., Glynn, E., Gaudenz, K., Wahl, M., Chen, J., Mushegian, A., & Pourquié, O. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133141 · Cited by 460
Cited by
Hormonal Modulation of Plant Immunity
Pieterse, C. M. J., Van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A., & Van Wees, S. C. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055 · Cited by 2,998
Signaling Mechanisms in Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI)
Bigeard, J., Colcombet, J., & Hirt, H. (2015) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.022 · Cited by 1,105
Mengiste, T. (2012) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172955 · Cited by 566
Transcriptional networks in plant immunity
Tsuda, K., & Somssich, I. E. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13286 · Cited by 552
Herrera-Vásquez, A., Salinas, P., & Holuigue, L. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00171 · Cited by 436
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, J. W., Loake, G. J., & Spoel, S. H.
- Venue
- The Plant Cell
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2809-2820
- ISSN
- 1040-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-298X
- OpenAlex
- W2168893664
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcription Dynamics in Plant Immunity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1105/tpc.111.087346
- The paper
- Moore, J. W., Loake, G. J., & Spoel, S. H. (2011). Transcription Dynamics in Plant Immunity. The Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.087346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.