Cited by 29Crystallography and Radiation PhenomenaDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques

Parametric down conversion of X-ray photons

Open access
Adams, Bernhard, Fernandez, Patricia, Lee, Wah-Keat, Materlik, Gerhard, Mills, Dennis M., Novikov, Dmitri V.·2000·Journal of Synchrotron Radiation

Abstract

Parametric down conversion of X-ray photons in diamond crystals was detected in two experiments, both using the phase-matching scheme first employed in the X-ray regime by Eisenberger & McCall [Phys. Rev. Lett. (1971), 26, 684-688]. The conversion events were detected by a combination of time-correlation spectroscopy and energy discrimination, using Si drift-chamber detectors. The time-correlation spectra give a direct comparison of the conversion rate over the accidental coincidence rate. Mechanisms for possible detection of false events and ways to cross check against them are discussed in detail.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0909049599015113

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parametric down conversion, which generates entangled photon pairs in the hard x-ray regime, has been demonstrated recently with XFELs.

    “Parametric down conversion (PDC), which generates entangled photon pairs in the hard x-rayregime [49,50], has been demonstrated recently with XFELs [51].”

    From Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics (2018) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Adams, B. (1999). ICFA 17th Advanced Beam Dynamics Work- shop on Advanced Light Sources, 6±9 April 1999, APS, Argonne, IL, USA. (http://www.aps.anl.gov/conferences/ FLSworkshop/proceedings/WG1.htm.)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, B., Fernandez, P., Lee, W.-K., Materlik, G., Mills, D. M., & Novikov, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
81-88
ISSN
0909-0495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134035593
Cited by
29
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Synchrotron Radiation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DESY Publication Database (PUBDB) (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Keywords
parametric down-conversion, X-ray photons, diamond crystals, phase matching, accidental coincidences, conversion rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review