Cited by 43Advanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesX-ray Diffraction in CrystallographyNuclear Physics and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The new small-angle X-ray scattering beamline for materials research at PETRA III: SAXSMAT beamline P62

Open access
Haas, S., Sun, X., Conceição, A. L. C., Horbach, J., Pfeffer, S.·2023·Journal of Synchrotron Radiation

Abstract

The SAXSMAT beamline P62 (Small-Angle X-ray Scattering beamline for Materials Research) is a new beamline at the high-energy storage ring PETRA III at DESY. This beamline is dedicated to combined small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS/WAXS) techniques for both soft and hard condensed matter systems. It works mainly in transmission geometry. The beamline covers an energy range from 3.5 keV to 35.0 keV, which fulfills the requirements of the user community to perform anomalous scattering experiments. Mirrors are used to reduce the intensity of higher harmonics. Furthermore, the mirrors and 2D compound refracting lenses can focus the beam down to a few micrometres at the sample position. This option with the high photon flux enables also SAXS/WAXS tensor tomography experiments to be performed at this new beamline in a relatively short time. The first SAXS/WAXS pattern was collected in August 2021, while the first user experiment was carried out two months later. Since January 2022 the beamline has been in regular user operation mode. In this paper the beamline optics and the SAXS/WAXS instrument are described and two examples are briefly shown.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s1600577523008603

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WAXS is a widely established technique for identifying crystallite phases and estimating crystallite sizes even in polymeric materials.

    “Nevertheless, WAXS is a widely established technique for identifying crystallite phases 44,45 and estimating crystallite sizes even in polymeric materials.[46][47][48]”

    From Correlative characterization of stereocomplex formation in blends of aliphatic polyester P(PCL m - b -PLLA n ) multiblock-copolymers and PDLA (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

    In “Examples > SAXS-CT of a phantom sample” (page unavailable), the paper uses WAXS peaks to identify crystalline ZnO and the absence of peaks to distinguish amorphous silica. It does not report estimating crystallite sizes from WAXS, including in polymeric materials; the stated nanoparticle sizes are not WAXS-derived crystallite-size estimates. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Drube, W., Bieler, M., Caliebe, W. A., Schulte-Schrepping, H., Spengler, J., Tischer, M. & Wanzenberg, R. (2016). AIP Conf. Proc. 1741, 020035.
  2. Glatter, O. & Kratky, O. (1982). Small Angle X-ray Scattering. Academic Press.
  3. Schöps, A., Vagin, P. & Tischer, M. (2016). AIP Conf. Proc. 1741, 020019.
  4. Schulte-Schrepping, H., Hesse, M., Degenhardt, M., Krüger, H., Peters, R., Peters, H. B. & Steffen, B. (2016). AIP Conf. Proc. 1741, 020041.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Haas, S., Sun, X., Conceição, A. L. C., Horbach, J., & Pfeffer, S.
Affiliations
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY (DE)
Corresponding author
Haas, S.
Venue
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
Published
2023-10-20
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1156-1167
ISSN
  • 0909-0495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-5775
OpenAlex
W4387799120
Cited by
43
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Synchrotron Radiation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Desy Publications Database (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Helmholtz Association
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Nuclear Physics and Applications
Keywords
small-angle X-ray scattering, wide-angle X-ray scattering, PETRA III, synchrotron beamline optics, resonant scattering, transmission geometry, tensor tomography, soft matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review