Cited by 63Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsCrystal structures of chemical compounds

Putting AlphaFold models to work with phenix.process_predicted_model and ISOLDE

Open access
Oeffner, Robert D., Croll, Tristan I., Millán, Claudia, Poon, Billy K., Schlicksup, Christopher J., Read, Randy J., Terwilliger, Tom C.·2022·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Abstract

AlphaFold has recently become an important tool in providing models for experimental structure determination by X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM. Large parts of the predicted models typically approach the accuracy of experimentally determined structures, although there are frequently local errors and errors in the relative orientations of domains. Importantly, residues in the model of a protein predicted by AlphaFold are tagged with a predicted local distance difference test score, informing users about which regions of the structure are predicted with less confidence. AlphaFold also produces a predicted aligned error matrix indicating its confidence in the relative positions of each pair of residues in the predicted model. The phenix.process_predicted_model tool downweights or removes low-confidence residues and can break a model into confidently predicted domains in preparation for molecular replacement or cryo-EM docking. These confidence metrics are further used in ISOLDE to weight torsion and atom-atom distance restraints, allowing the complete AlphaFold model to be interactively rearranged to match the docked fragments and reducing the need for the rebuilding of connecting regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s2059798322010026

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Barron, J. T. (2019). 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 4326–4334. Piscataway: IEEE.
  2. Hagberg, A. A., Swart, P. J. & Schult, D. A. (2008). Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008), edited by G. Varoquaux, T. Vaught & J. Millman, pp. 11–15.
  3. Terwilliger, T. C., Poon, B. K., Afonine, P. V., Schlicksup, C. J., Croll, T. I., Millán, C., Richardson, J. S., Read, R. J. & Adams, P. D. (2022). bioRxiv, 2022.01.07.475350.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oeffner, R. D., Croll, T. I., Millán, C., Poon, B. K., Schlicksup, C. J., Read, R. J., & Terwilliger, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Read, Randy J.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Published
2022-10-27
Volume
78
Issue
11
Pages
1303-1314
ISSN
2059-7983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307407928
Cited by
63
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship (209407/Z/ 17/Z)
  • National Institutes of Health (P01GM063210)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Crystal structures of chemical compounds
Keywords
AlphaFold, ISOLDE, protein structure prediction, domain decomposition, molecular replacement, structure refinement
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Software, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review