Cited by 104Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsCrystal structures of chemical compounds

Implications of AlphaFold 2 for crystallographic phasing by molecular replacement

Open access
McCoy, Airlie J., Sammito, Massimo D., Read, Randy J.·2022·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The AlphaFold2 results in the 14th edition of Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP14) showed that accurate (low root-mean-square deviation) in silico models of protein structure domains are on the horizon, whether or not the protein is related to known structures through high-coverage sequence similarity. As highly accurate models become available, generated by harnessing the power of correlated mutations and deep learning, one of the aspects of structural biology to be impacted will be methods of phasing in crystallography. Here, the data from CASP14 are used to explore the prospects for changes in phasing methods, and in particular to explore the prospects for molecular-replacement phasing using in silico models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s2059798321012122

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Blundell, T. L. & Johnson, L. N. (1976). Protein Crystallography. New York: Academic Press.
  2. Ewald, P. P. (1962). Fifty Years of X-ray Diffraction. Boston: Springer.
  3. Flower, T. G. & Hurley, J. H. (2021). Protein Sci. 30, 728–734. PMC7980513 33625752
  4. Jäger, F., Lamy, A., Guerini, N., Sun, W.-S. & Berntsson, R. P. A. (2020). bioRxiv, 2020.10.30.342212.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCoy, A. J., Sammito, M. D., & Read, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
McCoy, Airlie J.
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
2059-7983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200268506
Cited by
104
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (209407/Z/17/Z)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Crystal structures of chemical compounds
Keywords
AlphaFold2, crystallographic phasing, molecular replacement, CASP14, protein structure prediction, deep learning, correlated mutations
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Animals, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Software, Molecular Structure, Crystallography, X-Ray, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review