The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women, men and food: the significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices
Abstract
This article reports the results of the re‐analysis of a substantial set of survey based quantitative data relating to food beliefs, practices and preferences. The particular focus of attention was upon gender contrasts. Several statistically significant differences between men and women were identified. These differences occurred in such areas as views on food and health, the ethical dimensions of food production and food selection, nutritional attitudes and choices, dietary change, food work and body image. Two distinctive patterns emerged, which the authors termed “virtuous” and “robust”, the former exhibiting attitudes more typical of women, and the latter attitudes more typical of men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Body image and body shape ideals in magazines: exposure, awareness, and internalization
Cusumano, D. L., & Thompson, J. K. (1997) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf02936336 · Cited by 540
Cited by
Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—a review
Siró, I., Kápolna, E., Kápolna, B., & Lugasi, A. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060 · Cited by 1,758
Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants
Verbeke, W. (2005) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.01.001 · Cited by 839
Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions: A Review
Herzog, H. A. (2007) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279307780216687 · Cited by 465
Ureña, F., Bernabéu, R., & Olmeda, M. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00637.x · Cited by 215
Clonan, A., Wilson, P., Swift, J. A., Leibovici, D. G., & Holdsworth, M. (2015) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980015000567 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Beardsworth, A., Bryman, A., Keil, T., Goode, J., Haslam, C., & Lancashire, E.
- Venue
- British Food Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 470-491
- ISSN
- 0007-070X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033909061
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
