The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions: A Review
Abstract
I review the direction and magnitude (effect sizes) of gender differences that have been reported in several areas of human–animal interactions. These include: attitudes toward the treatment of animals, attachment to pets, involvement in animal protectionism, animal hoarding, hunting, animal abuse, and bestiality. Women, on average, show higher levels of positive behaviors and attitudes toward animals (e.g., attitudes towards their use, involvement in animal protection), whereas men typically have higher levels of negative attitudes and behaviors (e.g., hunting, animal abuse, less favorable attitudes toward animal protection). The effect sizes of gender differences range from small (e.g., attachment), to medium size (e.g., attitudes toward animal use) to large (e.g., animal rights activism, animal abuse by adults.) In most areas, there is considerable overlap between men and women, with much greater within-sex than between-sex variation. Research on the roles of gender in human–animal relationships is hindered by the omission in many reports of gender difference effect sizes and basic descriptive statistics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sociodemographic variables such as gender, age, family structure, education level and previous experiences with animals play a role in human-animal relationships.
“In addition, sociodemographic variables, such as gender, age, family structure, education level and previous experiences with animals, play a role [8,12,13,28,29,30].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
Women consistently show higher levels of empathy and concern regarding animal suffering, hold more positive attitudes towards animals, are more engaged in animal protection and less prone to animal exploitation, abuse and cruelty than men.
“Gender differences are well documented in the literature, with women consistently showing higher levels of empathy and concern regarding animal suffering, holding more positive attitudes towards animals and being more engaged in animal protection and less prone to animal exploitation, animal abuse and cruelty [13,29,31,32,33,34].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 102
- Al-Fayez G., 2003, Society & Animals, 11, 17, 10.1163/156853003321618819 · DOI
- Ascione F.R., 2001, Juvenile Justice Bulletin.
- 10.2752/089279303786992116 · DOI
- Arluke A., 2002, Symbolic Interaction, 25, 405, 10.1525/si.2002.25.4.405 · DOI
- Arluke A., 2003, Anthrozoös, 16, 3, 10.2752/089279303786992314 · DOI
- Arluke A., 1997, Society & Animals, 5, 1975
- 10.2752/089279305785594333 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853004323029513 · DOI
- 10.1108/00070700210418767 · DOI
- 10.1002/car.878 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.chi.0000128786.70992.9b · DOI
- Beetz, A.M. and Podberscek, A.L. eds. 2005. Bestiality and Zoophilia: Sexual Relations with Animals. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
- Bekoff, M. 1998. Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
- 10.1037/0033-2909.119.3.422 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853093X00037 · DOI
- Capaldo T., 2004, ATLA Supplement, 32, 525
- 10.1023/B:JACP.0000026145.69556.d9 · DOI
- Daly B., 2003, Anthrozoös, 16, 298, 10.2752/089279303786992026 · DOI
- Dindia K., 1992, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279392787011575 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.145 · DOI
- Eagly, A.H., Beall, A.E. and Sternberg, R.J. 2004. The Psychology of Gender. New York: Guilford Press.
- 10.1207/s15327019eb0603_5 · DOI
- Elston M.A., 1987, Vivisection in Historical Perspective, 259
- 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/354017 · DOI
- Flynn C.P., 2002, Society & Animals, 10, 137, 10.1163/156853002320292291 · DOI
- Franklin A.S., 2001, Society & Animals, 9, 127, 10.1163/156853001753639242 · DOI
- French, R.D. 1975. Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Frost R., 2000, Psychiatric Times, 14, 1
- 10.1207/s15327019eb0203_1 · DOI
- Galvin S., 1998, Society & Animals, 6, 1, 10.1163/156853098X00014 · DOI
- Gerbasi K., 2004, Society & Animals, 12, 359, 10.1163/1568530043068029 · DOI
- Gleyzer R., 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law., 30, 257
- Groves, J.M. 1997. Hearts and Minds: The Controversy over Laboratory Animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Guither, H.D. 1998. Animal Rights: History and Scope of a Radical Social Movement. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- 10.1177/0963662503012001247 · DOI
- 10.1163/1568530042880677 · DOI
- Henry B., 2004, Anthrozoös, 17, 290, 10.2752/089279304785643195 · DOI
- Henry B., Society & Animals.
- Herzog H., 1999, ISAZ Newsletter, 18, 2
- 10.2752/089279391787057170 · DOI
- Hills A.M., 1998, Anthrozoös, 11, 142, 10.2752/089279398787000616 · DOI
- 10.1177/0013164402062002002 · DOI
- Hunt, M. 1974. Sexual Behavior in the 1970s. Chicago, IL: Playboy Press.
- Hyde J.S., 2005, American Psychologist, 60, 581, 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581 · DOI · Paper page
- Hyde J.S., 1988, Psychological Bulletin:, 53
- 10.1177/016224399201700402 · DOI
- Jasper J.M., 1995, Social Problems, 42, 493, 10.2307/3097043 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279392787011395 · DOI
- Kellert S.R., 1987, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 13, 363
- 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.903 · DOI
- Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B. and Martin, C.E. 1948. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
- Kinsey, A.C., Pomeroy, W.B., Martin, C.E. and Gebhard, P.H. 1953. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
- 10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.470 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/089279304786991945 · DOI · Paper page
- LaFrance M., 2004, The Psychology of Gender., 328
- Lauber T.B., 2000, HDRU Series, No. 00–1, Department of Natural Resources
- Linn M.C., 1986, The Psychology of Gender Advances Through Meta-analysis, 67
- 10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00528.x · DOI
- Maccoby, E.E. 1998. The Two Sexes: Growing Up Apart, Coming Together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
- 10.1080/00223980.1994.9921292 · DOI
- Marx M.B., 1998, Anthrozoös, 2, 33, 10.2752/089279389787058262 · DOI
- Melson G., 1988, Anthrozoös, 2, 45, 10.2752/089279389787058181 · DOI
- 10.2307/41514782 · DOI
- Merz-Perez, L. and Heide, K.M. 2004. Animal Cruelty: Pathway to Violence Against People. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
- Miletski H., 2005, Bestiality and Zoophilia: Sexual Relations with Animals, 82
- 10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00131-7 · DOI
- Munro L., 2001, Society & Animals, 9, 43, 10.1163/156853001300108982 · DOI
- Offord D.R., 1991, The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression, 31
- 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000081433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/phr/114.1.81 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/089124396010004007 · DOI
- Peretti P.O., 1983, Panminerva Medica, 25, 127
- 10.1163/156853096X00034 · DOI
- Pifer L., 1994, Society & Animals, 2, 95, 10.1163/156853094X00126 · DOI
- Piper H., 2003, Journal of Social Work, 3, 161, 10.1177/14680173030032003 · DOI
- Plous S., 1991, Psychological Science, 2, 194, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00131.x · DOI
- Plous S., 1998, Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 48, 10.1037/0735-7036.112.1.48 · DOI
- Poresky R.H., 1998, Anthrozoös, 11, 236, 10.2752/089279398787000508 · DOI
- Richards R.T., 1991, Transactions of the 56th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference., 56, 363
- Robertson J.C., 2004, Anthrozoös, 17, 306, 10.2752/089279304785643186 · DOI
- 10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.331 · DOI · Paper page
- Rucker M.J., 2002, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 29, 63, 10.3138/jvme.29.2.63 · DOI
- Schenk S.A., 1994, Anthrozoös, 7, 60, 10.2752/089279394787002041 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279395787156572 · DOI
- Signal T.D., Society & Animals.
- Slater M.R., 2000, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 217, 472, 10.2460/javma.2000.217.472 · DOI
- Stallones L., 1990, Anthrozoös, 3, 171, 10.2752/089279390787057595 · DOI
- Stallones L., 1988, Anthrozoös, 2, 118, 10.2752/089279389787058127 · DOI
- Stevens L.T., 1990, Anthrozoös, 3, 177, 10.2752/089279390787057522 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279305785594342 · DOI
- Unger, R.K. 2001. Handbook of the Psychology of Gender. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- 10.2752/089279399787000129 · DOI
- 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.1.131 · DOI
- 10.1163/1568530042880668 · DOI · Paper page
- Walker M.W., 1998, Thesis, 8, 159
- 10.1163/156853097X00213 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026085410617 · DOI
- Worth D., 1981, Transactions and Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, 3, 280
- Wuensch K.L., 1998, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 139
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Preferences for Infant Facial Features in Pet Dogs and Cats: Infant Facial Features in Pet Species
Archer, J., & Monton, S. (2011) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01863.x · Cited by 171
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Konok, V., Korcsok, B., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.002 · Cited by 88
Rand, J., Scotney, R., Enright, A., Hayward, A., Bennett, P., & Morton, J. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14192849 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Herzog, H. A.
- Affiliations
- Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, USA
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-21
- ISSN
- 0892-7936
- 1753-0377
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review