Cited by 34Food Safety and HygieneNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

Food safety education initiative to increase consumer use of food thermometers in the United States

McCurdy, Sandra M., Takeuchi, Masami T., Edwards, Zena M., Edlefsen, Miriam, Kang, Dong‐Hyun, Elaine Mayes, V., Hillers, Virginia N.·2006·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this research is to increase consumers' use of food thermometers to test the endpoint temperature of small cuts of meats. Design/methodology/approach The project integrates research, classroom and non‐formal education. Findings Instant‐read food thermometers were available in >73 percent of USA supermarkets and most were accurate within 1.1°C. Lethality findings include that ground beef patties should either be cooked in a two‐sided grill or turned frequently during cooking. Focus group participants said the primary motivator to food thermometer use was avoidance of foodborne illness. Educational materials positively affected thermometer use among consumers. Practical implications Behavior change will be facilitated by widespread availability of thermometers, inclusion of endpoint temperatures in recipes, and seeing others use food thermometers. Originality/value This project develops and delivers information to encourage use of food thermometers to assess endpoint temperature when cooking small meat items.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00070700610688403

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many food workers believe that taking food safety precautions is unnecessary because they have been cooking for years without experiencing any negative effects.

    “While representative research data specific to age groups are limited, a study conducted by McCurdy et al.23 and Kosa et al.24, has shown that many food workers believe that taking food safety precautions is unnecessary because they have been cooking for years without experiencing any negative effects25.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCurdy, S. M., Takeuchi, M. T., Edwards, Z. M., Edlefsen, M., Kang, D., Elaine Mayes, V., & Hillers, V. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
  • Washington State University (US)
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
108
Issue
9
Pages
775-794
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019547065
Cited by
34
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
food safety education, consumer behavior change, meat cooking, endpoint temperature, ground beef, foodborne illness prevention, thermometer accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review