Cited by 24Food Safety and HygieneSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Meat thermometer usage amongst European and north American consumers: a scoping review

Open access
Elshahat, Sarah, Woodside, Jayne V., McKinley, Michelle C.·2019·Food Control

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.018

Cites

55 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Bruhn, C. M. (2014). Chicken preparation in the home: An observational study. Food Prot Trends, 34 (5): 318-30.
  2. Burch, N. L., and Sawyer, C. A. (1991). Food handling in convenience stores: The impact of personnel knowledge on facility sanitation. Environ Health, 54 (3): 23-27.
  3. Courtney, S. (2017). Food safety attitudes and self-reported behaviours of undergraduate students at the University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada) (Master's thesis, University of Waterloo), Retrieved from: https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/12439/Courtney_Sarah.pdf?seque nce=5.
  4. Mandarino, P. (2017). Temporary restaurant closures and food handling violations: Inspection reports in British Columbia (PhD thesis, Walden University) Retrieved from: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4903&context=dissertatio ns.
  5. Maughan, C. A. J. (2015). Making preparation of poultry and eggs safer for consumers: A focus on recipes and temperature (PhD thesis, Kansas State University) Retrieved from: https://krex.k- state.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/20538/CurtisMaughan2015.pdf?sequence=1.
  6. Mazengia, E., Fisk, C., Liao, G., Huang, H., and Meschke, J. (2015). Direct observational study of the risk of cross-contamination during raw poultry handling: Practices in private homes. Food Prot Trends, 35 (1): 8-23.
  7. Phang, H. (2010). Consumer handling of hamburgers (Master's thesis, University of California).
  8. Rhynard, H. T. 2001. Food safety knowledge of grocery store managers (Master's thesis, D'Youville College).
  9. Takeuchi, M. T. (2004). Use of transtheoretical model to develop an understanding of consumer responses to a food safety intervention involving use of food thermometers (PhD thesis, Washington State University).
  10. Yarrow, L. K. (2006). Food safety attitudes, beliefs, knowledge and self-reported practices of college students before and after educational intervention (PhD thesis).
  11. Yeung, H. F. (2014). Consumer food safety insight: Pre-and post-survey analysis of consumers receiving in-person versus web based food safety training (Master's thesis).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elshahat, S., Woodside, J. V., & McKinley, M. C.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Elshahat, Sarah
Venue
Food Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
106
Pages
106692
ISSN
0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952120133
Cited by
24
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Control (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
meat cooking, foodborne illness prevention, consumer behavior, barriers and facilitators, behavioral interventions, food safety policy, cooking habits, knowledge-behavior gap, socioeconomic disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review