The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine what reasons consumers give for either choosing or not choosing functional foods. Laddering interviews were used to find out how consumers described their reasons for choosing functional food alternatives in different product categories and how these descriptions are linked with values. Yoghurt, spread, juice, carbonated soft drinks, sweets and ice cream were used as example product categories. In total, five central means‐end chains, describing the product attributes, consequences and values behind respondents’ food choices, were found, which referred to healthiness, taste and pleasure, security and familiarity, convenience and price. They were found to be independent from each other and had different connotations depending on the product category. The results indicate that respondents did not see functional foods as one homogenous group over different product categories. Instead, consumers seemed to perceive functional products as a member of the general product category such as yoghurt or spread and only secondarily as a functional food.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STEPTOE, A., POLLARD, T. M., & WARDLE, J. (1995) · Appetite · doi:10.1006/appe.1995.0061 · Cited by 2,176
Cited by
Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—a review
Siró, I., Kápolna, E., Kápolna, B., & Lugasi, A. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060 · Cited by 1,758
Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health?
Verbeke, W. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.003 · Cited by 640
Attitudes behind consumers' willingness to use functional foods
Urala, N., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2004) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.02.008 · Cited by 468
Self-citationConsumers' changing attitudes towards functional foods
Urala, N., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2007) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.06.007 · Cited by 463
Self-citationConsumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probiotics
Annunziata, A., & Vecchio, R. (2013) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.009 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Urala, N., & Lähteenmäki, L.
- Venue
- Nutrition & Food Science
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 148-158
- ISSN
- 0034-6659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972426118
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/00346650310488499
- The paper
- Urala, N., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2003). Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices. Nutrition & Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/00346650310488499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.