Cited by 67Employment and Welfare StudiesEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesEducation and Labor Relations

Motives for accepting temporary employment: A typology

de Jong, Jeroen, De Cuyper, Nele, De Witte, Hans, Silla, Inmaculada, Bernhard‐Oettel, Claudia·2009·International Journal of Manpower

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer a typology of temporary workers, based on their motives for accepting their work arrangement, which includes voluntary, involuntary and stepping‐stone motives, and relate this typology to various individual and work‐related variables. Design/methodology/approach Latent class analysis of 645 European workers was used to construct a typology of temporary workers. Variation of individual and work‐related variables between types of temporary workers was analyzed using ANOVA. Findings The analyses suggest that there are three types of workers: involuntary temporary workers highlight the involuntary motive and the stepping‐stone motive; the stepping‐stone type stresses the stepping‐stone motive only, and the non‐involuntary group disagrees with all three motives. Moreover, the groups differed significantly on important work‐related variables such as occupational position, tenure, employability, and work‐involvement. However, differences in individual variables were limited. Research limitations/implications The research puts forward a more complex typology of temporary workers than is usually suggested. Moreover, the study shows a non‐involuntary group for which temporary employment can become a trap, and hence these workers should be targeted by future policy and interventions. Originality/value The research offers a typology of temporary workers, which is founded on motivation theory, and existing research on motives for accepting temporary employ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01437720910956745

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temporary workers can experience different forms of motivation at the same time.

    “De Jong, et al. [9] also confirmed that temporary workers could experience different forms of motivations at the same time.”
  • Different reasons to accept a temporary work arrangement exist.

    “The study of temporary workers’ motivations, which is often connected with their voluntarism toward their employment situation, has persuasively demonstrated the existence of different reasons to accept this work arrangement [9,10].”
  • Different temporary agency worker motivation profiles relate differently with work involvement and employability perception.

    “Concerning TAWs’ motivation, De Jong and colleagues [9] also showed that different profiles relate differently with work involvement and employability perception.”
  • The non-involuntary profile was the most distinct one: respondents in this cluster presented low levels of work involvement, although the difference was not significant, and higher levels of employability.

    “The non-involuntary profile (i.e., workers rating all motives (involuntary, stepping-stone, and voluntary) as unimportant) was the most distinct one: respondents in this cluster presented low levels of work involvement (although the difference was not significant) and higher levels of employability.”
  • De Jong and colleagues' findings included an involuntary profile, a non-involuntary profile, and a stepping-stone profile.

    “Their findings included an involuntary profile (high levels of involuntary and stepping-stone motives), a non-involuntary profile (all motives were rated as unimportant), and a stepping-stone profile (high scores of the stepping-stone and no reference to the voluntary or involuntary motives).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jong, J., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., Silla, I., & Bernhard‐Oettel, C.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
International Journal of Manpower
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-06-12
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
237-252
ISSN
0143-7720 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158255227
Cited by
67
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Manpower (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Labor Relations
Keywords
temporary employment, temporary workers, occupational position, tenure, employability, job involvement, motivation theories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review