Motives for accepting temporary employment: A typology
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to offer a typology of temporary workers, based on their motives for accepting their work arrangement, which includes voluntary, involuntary and stepping‐stone motives, and relate this typology to various individual and work‐related variables. Design/methodology/approach Latent class analysis of 645 European workers was used to construct a typology of temporary workers. Variation of individual and work‐related variables between types of temporary workers was analyzed using ANOVA. Findings The analyses suggest that there are three types of workers: involuntary temporary workers highlight the involuntary motive and the stepping‐stone motive; the stepping‐stone type stresses the stepping‐stone motive only, and the non‐involuntary group disagrees with all three motives. Moreover, the groups differed significantly on important work‐related variables such as occupational position, tenure, employability, and work‐involvement. However, differences in individual variables were limited. Research limitations/implications The research puts forward a more complex typology of temporary workers than is usually suggested. Moreover, the study shows a non‐involuntary group for which temporary employment can become a trap, and hence these workers should be targeted by future policy and interventions. Originality/value The research offers a typology of temporary workers, which is founded on motivation theory, and existing research on motives for accepting temporary employ…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Temporary workers can experience different forms of motivation at the same time.
“De Jong, et al. [9] also confirmed that temporary workers could experience different forms of motivations at the same time.”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Different reasons to accept a temporary work arrangement exist.
“The study of temporary workers’ motivations, which is often connected with their voluntarism toward their employment situation, has persuasively demonstrated the existence of different reasons to accept this work arrangement [9,10].”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Different temporary agency worker motivation profiles relate differently with work involvement and employability perception.
“Concerning TAWs’ motivation, De Jong and colleagues [9] also showed that different profiles relate differently with work involvement and employability perception.”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The non-involuntary profile was the most distinct one: respondents in this cluster presented low levels of work involvement, although the difference was not significant, and higher levels of employability.
“The non-involuntary profile (i.e., workers rating all motives (involuntary, stepping-stone, and voluntary) as unimportant) was the most distinct one: respondents in this cluster presented low levels of work involvement (although the difference was not significant) and higher levels of employability.”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
De Jong and colleagues' findings included an involuntary profile, a non-involuntary profile, and a stepping-stone profile.
“Their findings included an involuntary profile (high levels of involuntary and stepping-stone motives), a non-involuntary profile (all motives were rated as unimportant), and a stepping-stone profile (high scores of the stepping-stone and no reference to the voluntary or involuntary motives).”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
De Jong and colleagues' analysis reached a three-profile solution combining voluntary or intrinsic motives, involuntary or extrinsic motives, and stepping-stone motives.
“With regard to temporary work, De Jong and colleagues’ [9] analysis reached a three-profile solution that combined (a) voluntary motives or intrinsic choices (i.e., the freedom offered by temporary work); (b) involuntary motives or extrinsic choices (i.e., the difficulty of finding a permanent job), and (c) stepping-stone motives”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
TAWs are able to incorporate external regulation and accept a situation that is not what they really want, but they recognize the advantages of being employed and the opportunity to satisfy their aspirations to obtain a better/different job.
“TAWs are able to incorporate the external regulation and accept a situation that is not what they really want, but they recognize the advantages of being employed and the opportunity to satisfy their aspirations to obtain a better/different job [9].”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The high presence of identified motivation in all profiles-even Involuntary and Low present some degree-shows that either voluntarily or involuntarily, TAWs rely on temporary employment to obtain a permanent position within the client company.
“Moreover, the high presence of the identified motivation in all profiles—even the Involuntary Motivation and the Low Motivation profiles present in some degree of identified motivation—show that either voluntarily or involuntarily, TAWs rely on temporary employment to obtain a permanent position [9] within the client company.”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
By comparing these results with De Jong et al., it was possible to overcome the small dimension of their measure and the imprecision of their typology proposal.
“By comparing these results with those obtained by De Jong and colleagues [9], it seems clear that it was possible to overcome the small dimension of their measure and the imprecision of their typology proposal”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs*
Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00384 · Cited by 2,062 · see citing works
Measurement of job and work involvement
Kanungo, R. N. (1982) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341 · Cited by 1,718 · see citing works
Temporary Employees in Singapore: What Drives Them?
Tan, H.-H., & Tan, C.-P. (2002) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980209604141 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis
Sobral, F., Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18136779 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“[9] related the temporary workers’ motivation profiles with individual characteristics (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- de Jong, J., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., Silla, I., & Bernhard‐Oettel, C.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (ES)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Venue
- International Journal of Manpower
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-06-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-252
- ISSN
- 0143-7720 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158255227
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Manpower (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Labor Relations
- Keywords
- temporary employment, temporary workers, occupational position, tenure, employability, job involvement, motivation theories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review