How can we make sense of leadership in the 21st century?
Abstract
Explores the development of thinking on leadership and places it in the context of the dominant discourses of the period in which studies were conducted. Argues that if a “sense making” paradigm is adopted. it becomes feasible to identify a model of leadership, which is relevant to the context of complexity and change facing organisations in the early twenty‐first century. The model emerges when the measure of effectiveness is changed from organisational success to the impact of the leader on followers and on building of capability. The argument for such a shift is underpinned by the movement of dominant organisational logic from a Weberian rational/analytical one to a logic which acknowledges emotional considerations. Within the leadership arena it has been proposed that emotional intelligence is a major factor underpinning success. Presents data from recent research, which empirically demonstrates linkages between emotional intelligence and leadership. These findings are examined in conjunction with the “Emergent model”.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is clear and growing evidence that the role of leaders in the change process significantly affects the success of change.
“there is clear, and growing evidence that the role of leaders in the change process does affect significantly the success of change”
From What Does It Take to Implement Change Successfully? A Study of the Behaviors of Successful Change Leaders (2011) · cites this paper as Higgs, 2003
In the broader leadership literature, the move to a more enabling approach is seen to be related to the emotional content of leader-follower exchange.
“In the broader leadership literature, the move to a more enabling approach is seen to be related to the emotional content of leader-follower exchange”
From What Does It Take to Implement Change Successfully? A Study of the Behaviors of Successful Change Leaders (2011) · cites this paper as Higgs, 2003
Cites
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg · Cited by 10,484 · see citing works
Can emotional intelligence be measured and developed?
Dulewicz, V., & Higgs, M. (1999) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437739910287117 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Building change leadership capability: ‘The quest for change competence’
Higgs, M., & Rowland, D. (2000) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/714042459 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rosete, D., & Ciarrochi, J. (2005) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730510607871 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Higgs, M., & Rowland, D. (2011) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886311404556 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Higgs, M.
- Corresponding author
- Higgs, Malcolm
- ORCID
- Higgs, Malcolm
- Venue
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 273-284
- ISSN
- 0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985184381
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal (publishedVersion)
- CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
- Keywords
- leadership, sensemaking, leadership models, emotional intelligence, organizational change, complexity, capability development, Weberian rationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review