The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A factor analysis of Page and Wong’s servant leadership instrument
Abstract
Abstract This study conducted a factor analysis of Page and Wong's servant leadership instrument and reduced the 99‐item scale to 20 items yielding three factors: vision (0.97 Cronbach alpha), empowerment (0.89 Cronbach alpha), and service (0.94 Cronbach alpha). While this study only confirmed three of the original 12 factors sought by Page and Wong the results indicate that Page and Wong's instrument has merit and deserves further development and modification.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When used in other samples than the development one, constructs that were hypothesized to be separate constructs collapsed into one (e.g., Dannhauser and Boshoff 2007; Dennis and Winston 2003).”
From The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2011) · cites this paper as Dennis and Winston 2003
In the citing paper
“In an attempt to replicate this factor structure, Dennis and Winston (2003) even brought it back to a three-dimensional structure.”
From The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2011) · cites this paper as Dennis and Winston (2003)
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,801
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Bandura, A. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221129.n6 · Cited by 9,948
Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness
(1979) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(79)90092-2 · Cited by 4,096
Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach.
Funk, S. G., Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290248 · Cited by 4,007
A review of servant leadership attributes: developing a practical model
Russell, R. F., & Stone, A. G. (2002) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730210424 · Cited by 1,231
Transactional and Transformational Leadership: A Constructive/Developmental Analysis
Kuhnert, K. W., & Lewis, P. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1987.4306717 · Cited by 975
Pree, M. D. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 715
Stewardship: choosing service over self-interest
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-3859 · Cited by 641
Servant Leadership: Setting the Stage for Empirical Research
Farling, M. L., Stone, A. G., & Winston, B. E. (1999) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1177/107179199900600104 · Cited by 450
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis
van Dierendonck, D. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310380462 · Cited by 2,218
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004 · Cited by 1,858
“DeVellis, 2017; Hinkin, 1995, 1998). More specifically, we employ the scale development guidelines established by Hinkin (1995) given their systematic and comprehensive inclusion of psychometric properties of a measure.”
MethodA systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts
Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6 · Cited by 957
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure
van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1 · Cited by 1,096
“When used in other samples than the development one, constructs that were hypothesized to be separate constructs collapsed into one (e.g., Dannhauser and Boshoff 2007; Dennis and Winston 2003).”
BackgroundMethodDevelopment of the servant leadership assessment instrument
Dennis, R. S., & Bocarnea, M. (2005) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730510633692 · Cited by 458
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dennis, R., & Winston, B. E.
- Affiliations
- Regent University (US)
- ORCID
- Winston, Bruce E.
- Venue
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 455-459
- ISSN
- 0143-7739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093818392
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Leadership & Organization Development Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- servant leadership, scale factor structure, scale reduction, vision, empowerment, service, leadership assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
