CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Swearing at work and permissive leadership culture: When anti‐social becomes social and incivility is acceptable

Baruch, Yehuda, Jenkins, Stuart·2007·Leadership & Organization Development Journal
DOI 10.1108/01437730710780958
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the use of expletives and swearing in the workplace. It proposes to challenge leadership style and to suggest ideas for management best practice. Design/methodology/approach: Case studies and qualitative analysis were applied, methods that fit well for this sensitive topic. Findings: This paper identifies the relevance, and even the importance, of using non‐conventional and sometimes uncivil language in the workplace. Research limitations/implications: Sample size and representativeness present limitations. Practical implications: There is a need for leaders to apply, under certain circumstances, a permissive leadership culture. This paper advises leaders on how it may lead to positive consequences. Originality/value: The paper is an original contribution to an area where research is scarce. A certain originality element stems from the fact that, focusing on swearing language, the paper found it necessary to use swear words (avoiding usage of the explicit form); bearing in mind the purpose of the paper, the paper hopes that this will not cause offence to the readership of the journal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/01437730710780958

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Analoui, F. and Kakabadse, A. (1993), “Industrial conflict and its expressions”, Employee Relations, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 46‐62. · DOI
  2. Bacharach, S.B., Bamberger, P.A. and Sonnenstuhl, W.J. (2002), “Driven to drink: managerial control, work‐related risk factors, and employee problem drinking”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 637‐58. · DOI
  3. Bailey, L.A. and Timm, L. (1977), “More on women's – and men's – expletives”, Anthropological Linguistics, Vol. 18 No. 9, pp. 438‐49, In Limbrick, P. (1991), “A study of male and female expletive use in single and mixed sex situations”, Te Reo: The Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand, Vol. 34.
  4. Baruch, Y. (2005), “Bullying on the net: adverse behaviour on e‐mail and its impact”, Information & Management, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 361‐71. · DOI
  5. Baruch, Y. and Hall, D.T. (2004), “The academic career: a model for future careers in other sectors?”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 241‐62. · DOI
  6. Bell, A. (1984), “Language style as audience design”, Language in Society, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 145‐204. · DOI
  7. Bertolotti, F., Macrì, D.M. and Tagliaventi, M.R. (2005), “Spontaneous self‐managing practices in groups: evidence from the field”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 14, pp. 366‐84. · DOI
  8. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987), Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. · DOI
  9. Callahan, J.L., Hasler, M.G. and Tolson, H. (2005), “Perceptions of emotion expressiveness: gender differences among senior executives”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 512‐28. · DOI
  10. Cameron, D. and Coates, J. (1988), Women in their Speech Communities, Longman, London, Hughes, S.E. (1992), “Expletives of lower working‐class women”, Language in Society, Vol. 21, p. 2. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chaika, E. (1982), Language: The Social Mirror, Newbury House, Boston, MA, Hughes, S.E. (1992), “Expletives of lower working‐class women”, Language in Society, Vol. 21, p. 2. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Coates, J. (1996), Women Talk, Blackwell, Oxford.
  13. Coates, J. (2002), Men Talk, Blackwell, Oxford. · DOI
  14. Cooper, C.D. (2005), “Just joking around? Employee humor expression as an ingratiatory behavior”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, pp. 765‐76. · DOI
  15. Daly, N., Holmes, J., Newton, J. and Stubbe, M. (2004), “Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor”, Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 34, pp. 1683‐710. · DOI
  16. de Klerk, V. (1991), “Expletives: men only?”, Communication Monographs, Vol. 58, pp. 156‐69. · DOI
  17. de Klerk, V. (1992), “How taboo are taboo words for girls?”, Language in Society, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 277‐90. · DOI
  18. DuFrene, D.D. and Lehman, C.M. (2002), “Persuasive appeal for clean language”, Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 48‐55. · DOI
  19. Dutton, J.E. (2003), “Breathing life into organizational studies”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 12, pp. 5‐19. · DOI
  20. Eckert, P. and McConnell‐Ginet, S. (1999), “New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research”, Language in Society, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 185‐202. · DOI
  21. Freedman, M. (2000), “The curse of consultants”, Forbes, Vol. 165 No. 2.
  22. Glendinning, P.M. (2001), “Workplace bullying: curing the cancer of the American workplace”, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 30, pp. 269‐87. · DOI
  23. Gordon, E. (1997), “Sex, speech and stereotypes: why women use prestige speech forms more than men”, Language in Society, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 47‐63. · DOI
  24. Griffin, R.W., O'Leary‐Kelly, A. and Collins, J.M. (Eds) (1999), Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
  25. Hatch, M.J. (1993), “The dynamics of organizational culture”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, pp. 657‐93. · DOI
  26. Hay, A. and Hodgkinson, M. (2006), “Rethinking leadership: a way forward for teaching leadership?”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 144‐58. · DOI
  27. Higgins, J. and McAllaster, C. (2002), “Want innovation? Then use cultural artefacts that support it”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 74‐84. · DOI
  28. Hodson, R. (2005), “Management behaviour as social capital: a systematic analysis of organizational ethnographies”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, pp. 41‐65. · DOI
  29. Hughes, S.E. (1992), “Expletives of lower working‐class women”, Language in Society, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 291‐303. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jay, T. (1999), Why We Curse: A Neuro‐Psycho‐Social Theory of Speech, John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PA. · DOI
  31. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. and Wilkinson, I. (1980), “Intraorganizational influence tactics: explorations in getting one's way”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 440‐52. · DOI
  32. Lansisalmi, H., Peiro, J.M. and Kivimaki, M. (2000), “Collective stress and coping in the context of organizational culture”, European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 527‐59. · DOI
  33. Liden, R.C. and Mitchell, T.R. (1988), “Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp. 572‐87. · DOI
  34. Limbrick, P. (1991), “A study of male and female expletive use in single and mixed sex situations”, Te Reo: The Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand, Vol. 34.
  35. Longenecker, J.G., McKinney, J.A. and Moore, C.W. (1989), “The generation gap in business ethics”, Business Horizons, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 9‐14. · DOI
  36. McGrath, A.E. (1994), Reformation Thought: An Introduction, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
  37. Montagu, A. (2001), The Anatomy of Swearing, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA.
  38. Paivio, A. and Begg, I. (1981), Psychology of Language, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Risch, B. (1987), “Women's derogatory terms for men: that's right, ‘dirty’ words”, Language in Society, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 353‐358. · DOI
  39. Pallot, C. (2002), “More than words? Strong language in the workplace: an employer's guide”, October 2002 press release to the Exeter Express & Echo, by Bevan Ashford legal partnership.
  40. Peterson, L. (2000), “Can't stop swearing? James O'Connor says ’bunk!’”, Biography 4, Vol. 1.
  41. Robinson, S.L. and Bennett, R.J. (1995), “A typology of deviant workplace behaviours”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 555‐72. · DOI
  42. Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S. and Koslowsky, M. (Eds) (2003), Misbehavior and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations, Palgrave, New York, NY. · DOI
  43. Scherer, A.G. (2003), “Models of explanation in organizational theory”, in Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 310‐44.
  44. Stapleton, K. (2003), “Gender and swearing: a community practice”, Women and Language, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 22‐33.
  45. Stubbe, M. (1998), “Researching language in the workplace: a participatory model”, paper presented at the Australian Linguistic Society Conference, Brisbane University of Queensland, Brisbane, July.
  46. Swallow, C. (2004), “Protecting workers form travel rage”, Logistics & Transport Focus, Vol. 6 No. 9, p. 49.
  47. Tannenbaum, R. and Schmidt, W.H. (1986), “Excerpts from ‘how to choose a leadership pattern’”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 64 No. 4, p. 137.
  48. Westwood, R. and Linstead, S. (2001), The Language of Organization, Sage, London. · DOI
  49. Wetzel, P. (1988), “Are ‘powerless’ communication strategies the Japanese norm?”, Language in Society, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 555‐64. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Baruch, Y., & Jenkins, S.
Venue
Leadership & Organization Development Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-09-04
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
492-507
ISSN
0143-7739
DOI
10.1108/01437730710780958
Cited by
43
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review