The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tactile sensing in intelligent robotic manipulation – a review
Abstract
Purpose: When designing hardware and algorithms for robotic manipulation and grasping, sensory information is typically needed to control the grasping process. This paper presents an overview of the major grasping and manipulation approaches and the more common hardware used to obtain the necessary sensory information. Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an overview of tactile sensing in intelligent robotic manipulation. The history, the common issues, and applications are reviewed. Sensor performance is briefly discussed and compared to the human tactile sense. Advantages and disadvantages of the most common sensor approaches are discussed. Some examples are given of sensors that are widely available as of today. Eventually, some examples of the state‐of‐the‐art in tactile sensing application are presented. Findings: Although many sensor technologies and strong theoretical models have been developed, there is still much left to be done in intelligent grasping and manipulation. This is partly due to the youth of the field and the complex nature of safe control in uncertain environments. Even though there are impressive results when it comes to specific examples of advanced manipulation, there seems to be room for great improvements of hardware and especially algorithms when it comes to more generic everyday domestic tasks. Originality/value: This paper presents a review of sensor hardware while also giving a glimpse of the major topics in grasping and manipulation. While better hardware of course is desirable, the major challenges seem to lie in the development and application of grasping and manipulation algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hammock, M. L., Chortos, A., Tee, B. C. ‐., Tok, J. B. ‐., & Bao, Z. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302240 · Cited by 2,396
Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration
Ajoudani, A., Zanchettin, A. M., Ivaldi, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Kosuge, K., & Khatib, O. (2018) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2 · Cited by 832
Tactile sensing for dexterous in-hand manipulation in robotics—A review
Yousef, H., Boukallel, M., & Althoefer, K. (2011) · Sensors and Actuators A: Physical · doi:10.1016/j.sna.2011.02.038 · Cited by 784
Zhang, B., Xie, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, K., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105694 · Cited by 484
Biomimetic tactile sensor array
Wettels, N., Santos, V. J., Johansson, R. S., & Loeb, G. E. (2008) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1163/156855308x314533 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Tegin, J., & Wikander, J.
- Venue
- Industrial Robot: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-70
- ISSN
- 0143-991X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041437888
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tactile sensing in intelligent robotic manipulation – a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01439910510573318
- The paper
- Tegin, J., & Wikander, J. (2005). Tactile sensing in intelligent robotic manipulation – a review. Industrial Robot: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/01439910510573318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.