The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs
Abstract
The ISO 14001 environmental management system (EMS) standard has been designed to help organizations in the creation of structured mechanisms for continuous improvement in environmental performance. This paper evaluates how ISO 14001 EMS and EMS‐like standards aid organizations in operating continuous source reduction programs by exploring some critical elements for program success. The ISO 14001 standard helps organizations define important EMS elements for continuous source reduction. However, adopting these elements may necessitate cultural changes, the core elements of which are embodied by TQM principles. The cultural changes support complex operational activities aimed at source reduction. Three case study firms are used to evaluate these critical EMS elements. Each firm showed substantially idiosyncratic situations attributable to each organization’s size, history, corporate culture, and technology. Despite the differences, however, the cases highlighted one critical point: employee empowerment, their willingness to make suggestions for improvement, and management’s effort to create employee participation in decision making are critical elements in managing continuous source reduction programs. These initial empirical observations provide some insight into how this cultural change may occur.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employee participation results in reduced contamination.
“Employee participation results in the enhanced effectiveness of environmental management systems thanks to more efficient resource usage [76], limited wasteful practice [80], and reduced contamination [81].”
From Green Human Resource Management as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Polish Young Company Experience (2018) · cites this paper as [81]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.820 · Cited by 2,252 · see citing works
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518 · see citing works
Self-citationMousa, S. K., & Othman, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118595 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Guerci, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Bombiak, E., & Marciniuk-Kluska, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061739 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations
Ren, S., & Jackson, S. E. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A., Fonseca, S. A., & Nagano, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.018 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees
Wolf, J. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1731 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kitazawa, S., & Sarkis, J.
- Affiliations
- Clark University (US)
- ORCID
- Sarkis, Joseph
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-248
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058698054
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 24.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
- Keywords
- ISO 14001, environmental management systems, total quality management, organizational culture, employee empowerment, employee participation in decision-making, environmental performance improvement, organizational culture change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review