The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management practices for environmental innovation and performance
Abstract
This paper explores whether there are discernible differences in the environmental innovation and performance of US chemical firms that can be explained by differences in the management practices and characteristics of the firms. Using data from a national survey, firm visits, and phone interviews, this research assesses the pervasiveness of the adoption of environmental management practices. It also assesses whether the adoption of these practices is related to leadership in environmental innovation and performance. This paper shows high levels of adoption of several practices for improving environmental innovation and performance. Firms are using practices such as total quality management, certification of suppliers, R&D, and the involvement of employees in innovation and training to integrate environmental management with their production systems. In addition, firms with the highest adoption levels of environmental practices have substituted cleaner materials and changed their production processes for cleaner production, and they are leaders in reducing their generation of chemical waste.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Guerci, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1 · Cited by 444
Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2002) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656710210434801 · Cited by 441
Morioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Theyel, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-266
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117594400
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570010304288
- The paper
- Theyel, G. (2000). Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010304288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
