The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next
Abstract
Purpose: This paper provides an update of Neely et al.'s (1995) literature review “Performance measurement system design”. It was commissioned to appear in a special issue of the International Journal of Operations & Production Management to celebrate the journal's 25th anniversary. Design/methodology/approach: The paper employs a citation/co‐citation analysis of work in the field of performance measurement to explore developments in the field globally. Findings: The paper argues that scholars working in the field of performance measurement agree about the key research questions despite the fact that they come from different disciplinary backgrounds. The paper identifies the key contributors to the field based on a citation/co‐citation analysis and argues that the field is now entering a phase of empirical investigation and theoretical verification of some core concepts. Research limitations/implications: The research reported in the paper is limited to work that deals directly with performance measurement. It excludes related research – such as literature on management control and performance management – and clearly could be extended to include these literatures. Originality/value: The paper will be valuable to scholars working in the field of performance measurement who wish to understand how the field has developed and evolved and/or those who are interested in avenues for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579510083622 · Cited by 3,259
Self-citation
Cited by
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562629 · Cited by 7,495
An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends
Carvalho, M. M., Fleury, A., & Lopes, A. P. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.008 · Cited by 477
Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8 · Cited by 365
Morioka, S. N., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.103 · Cited by 138
Researching performance measurement systems: An information systems perspective
Marchand, M., & Raymond, L. (2008) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570810881802 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Neely, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1264-1277
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1579972629
- Cited by
- 866
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443570510633648
- The paper
- Neely, A. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.