Cited by 138Accounting and Organizational ManagementCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingSustainable Development and Environmental Policy

Measuring sustainability in practice: Exploring the inclusion of sustainability into corporate performance systems in Brazilian case studies

Morioka, Sandra Naomi, Carvalho, Marly M.·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Given the challenge of measuring corporate sustainability in practice, the aim of the present exploratory research is to investigate the incorporation of sustainability in corporate performance measurement systems, towards sustainability performance measurement system (SPMS). More specifically, the research seeks to explore the factors that affect the interaction between sustainability indicators regarding their relative priority for decision making and to investigate how firms include sustainability indicators into their corporate performance measurement systems. To address these objectives, cross-sector case studies were conducted in five firms located in Brazil. Data were collected based on semi-structured interviews and triangulated with published reports and internal documents. The results show four performance measurement systems that encompass sustainability indicators: (a) periodic performance measurement system of a specific area/department; (b) individual performance assessment; (c) sustainability reporting; and (d) project assessment. The paper value lies in bringing a structured view of integrating sustainability in a corporate performance measurement system, based on empirical evidence. However, further research is still needed to develop a more integrative and dynamic SPMS encompassing both leading and lagging indicators to better understand the priorities, interactions and tradeoffs between sustainability indicators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.103

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Morioka, S. N., & Carvalho, M. M.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Morioka, Sandra Naomi
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
136
Pages
123-133
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2280043521
Cited by
138
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
27.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  • Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Keywords
corporate sustainability, sustainability performance measurement, sustainability indicators, sustainability reporting, leading and lagging indicators, indicator prioritization, decision-making, Brazilian companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review