The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate two potentially key drivers of a firm's supply chain agility, namely strategic sourcing and firm's strategic flexibility. Despite some theoretical and conceptual works suggesting that some elements of these two constructs may relate to agility, this has not yet been assessed together empirically. This study aims to address this gap in the literature. Design/methodology/approach: This study involves an empirical investigation of a theory‐based model based on the competence‐capability framework, and a dynamic capabilities theoretical perspective, where the internal competencies of strategic sourcing and firm's strategic flexibility relate to the dynamic capability of the firm's supply chain agility. This investigation also includes the testing of a possible mediation effect of firm's strategic flexibility on the relationship between strategic sourcing and the firm's supply chain agility. The model is tested utilizing data from 144 US manufacturing firms via partial least square methodology. Findings: The results of the empirical study indicated that both strategic sourcing and firm's strategic flexibility were significantly related to the firm's supply chain agility. In addition, while a full mediation effect was not found on the part of strategic flexibility, there was evidence for partial mediation. Research limitations/implications: Given that the data are from specific US industries, the generalizability of current findings to other industries or countries may require additional investigation. Originality/value: Given the attention paid to agility in terms of its importance to responding to business uncertainty, and more recently, as an important capability in managing supply chain disruption risks, this paper investigates how strategic sourcing and flexibility can contribute to agility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,433
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632 · Cited by 9,943
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Cited by
Schilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of procurement
Roberta Pereira, C., Christopher, M., & Lago Da Silva, A. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-09-2013-0346 · Cited by 396
Kim, M., & Chai, S. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.007 · Cited by 367
Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy
Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Mangla, S. K., & Luthra, S. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502 · Cited by 339
Lean and green combine to impact environmental and operational performance
Inman, R. A., & Green, K. W. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1447705 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiang, C., Kocabasoglu‐Hillmer, C., & Suresh, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-01-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-78
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004770110
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 18.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/01443571211195736
- The paper
- Chiang, C., Kocabasoglu‐Hillmer, C., & Suresh, N. (2012). An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211195736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.