Investigating the impact of e‐business applications on supply chain collaboration in the German automotive industry
Abstract
Purpose The internet and web‐based technologies have enabled the integration of information systems across organisational boundaries in ways that were hitherto impossible. The measurement of e‐business (EB) value has been traditionally considered as a single construct. However, the desire to develop a comprehensive understanding of the impact of EB applications from a theoretical perspective has resulted in the modelling of multiple EB constructs. The impact of EB enabled collaboration on operational performance was also investigated. The purpose of this paper is to explore the enabling role of multiple dimensions of EB investigating if all EB applications impact directly and positively on supply chain collaboration. Design/methodology/approach A web‐based survey was carried out to collect data within the German automotive industry. Structural equation modelling was conducted to test the measurement and structural model. Findings The results provide justification for the modelling of EB in multiple dimensions. Furthermore, some EB applications impacted positively on supply chain collaboration whilst some did not. The results also proved that EB enabled collaboration impacted directly and positively on the multiple dimensions of operational performance tested. Practical implications EB applications cannot be viewed by practising managers as being universally beneficial in improving collaboration across a buyer‐supplier boundary. However, the results reveal that, by carefully s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This explanatory power compares well with other eSCM studies.
“This explanatory power compares well with other eSCM studies (See for example, Kauppi et al., 2013; Martínez-Caro and Cegarra-Navarro, 2009; Wiengarten et al., 2013).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Wiengarten et al., 2013
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Design and Ownership of Two-Sided Networks: Implications for Internet Platforms
Bakos, Y., & Katsamakas, E. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250208 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
Brandon-Jones, A., & Kauppi, K. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0346 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Graham, S. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.005 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Chomchaiya, S., & Esichaikul, V. (2016) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-12-2013-0210 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., McKittrick, A., & Fynes, B.
- Affiliations
- Esade (ES)
- University of Ulster (GB)
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Venue
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-01-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-48
- ISSN
- 0144-3577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049634166
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 27.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Operations & Production Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Collaboration in agile enterprises
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Keywords
- e-commerce, supply chain collaboration, buyer-supplier relationships, operational performance, automotive industry, German automotive industry, web technologies, information systems integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review