Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: a research agenda

Al‐Mashari, Majed·2002·Industrial Management & Data Systems
DOI 10.1108/02635570210421354
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The continuing development of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems has been considered by many researchers and practitioners as one of the major IT innovations in this decade. ERP solutions seek to integrate and streamline business processes and their associated information and work flows. What makes this technology more appealing to organizations is increasing capability to integrate with the most advanced electronic and mobile commerce technologies. However, as is the case with any new IT field, research in the ERP area is still lacking and the gap in the ERP literature is huge. Attempts to fill this gap by proposing a novel taxonomy for ERP research. Also presents the current status with some major themes of ERP research relating to ERP adoption, technical aspects of ERP and ERP in IS curricula. The discussion presented on these issues should be of value to researchers and practitioners. Future research work will continue to survey other major areas presented in the taxonomy framework.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02635570210421354

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Cissna, T. (1998), “ERP sofware implementation brings pains with its gains”, Electric Light and Power, No. 76, pp. 43‐4.
  2. Elam, J., Murphy, K., Becerra‐Fernandez, I. and Simon, S. (1999), “ERP as an enabler of curriculum integration”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 13‐20.
  3. Gable, G. (1998), “Large package software: a neglected technology?”, Journal of Global Information Management, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 3‐4.
  4. Gibbon, G. and Aisbett, J. (1999), “Teaching of SAP R/3 through an understanding of the history of business information requirements”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 70‐7.
  5. Ongkasuwan, M. (1999), “A framework for adopting SAP R/3 into MIS curriculum”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 115‐18.
  6. Pu Ng, C. and Chan, T. (1999), “Optimal tuning for ERP upgrade: a preliminary model”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annnual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 102‐14.
  7. Quinton, A. (1999), “Organizing, planning and implementing SAP R/3 into an undergraduate business curriculum”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 119‐26.
  8. Rick, M. (1997), “IT integration programmed for global operation”, Chemical Week, Vol. 159 No. 6, pp. 21‐7.
  9. Sato, R., Hotaka, R. and Noguchi, H. (1999), “ERP and business process engineering in education”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 127‐33.
  10. Scapens, R. (1998), “SAP: integrated information systems and the implications for management accountants”, Management Accounting, Vol. 76 No. 8, pp. 46‐8.
  11. Seethamraju, R. (1999), “ERP and business management – new directions for education and research”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 133‐9.
  12. Soliman, F. (1998), “Optimum level of process mapping and least cost business process reengineering”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18 No. 9/10. pp. 810‐16. · doi:10.1108/01443579810225469
  13. Stedman, C. (1999), “Tracking changes – a must in ERP projects: business users sometimes fail to realise importance”, Computerworld, pp. 41‐2.
  14. Stewart, G. and Gable, G. (1999), “Applying the case study and action research methods to postgraduate studies of enterprise processing systems implementations”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 159‐70.
  15. Stewart, G. and Rosemann, M. (1999), “Developing industry strength university education in enterprise resource management through international collaborative efforts”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 148‐58.
  16. Sweat, J. (1998), “Enterprise application suites are becoming a focal point of business and technology planning”, InformationWeek, No. 704, 12 October, pp. 42‐7.
  17. Umar, A. and Missier, P. (1999), “A knowledge‐based decision support workbench for enterprise resource integration and migration”, in Elder, J., Maiden, N. and Missikoh, M. (Eds), Proceedings of EMRPS ’99, Centro Studi San Salador – Venice, 25‐27 November 1999, available at: http://leks.iasi.rm.cnr.it/emrps’99/papers/umar.pdf.
  18. Vercoulen, F. and Wegberg, M. (1999), “Standard selection modes in dynamic, complex industries”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Standardisation and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT), pp. 1‐11.
  19. Victor, F., Mayr, R. and Amon, O. (1999), “Doing the right thing right – experiences on an interdisciplinary SAP R/3 education project”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia‐Pacific Conference, pp. 171‐9.

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Al‐Mashari, M.
Venue
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
165-170
ISSN
0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/02635570210421354
OpenAlex
W2036636632
Cited by
342
References
12
FWCI
25.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: a research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02635570210421354
The paper
Al‐Mashari, M. (2002). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems: a research agenda. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570210421354

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.