The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
B2C e‐commerce web site quality: an empirical examination
Abstract
Purpose: To identify what constitutes web site quality or what makes a web site effective. Design/methodology/approach: This article examines and integrates four sets of factors that capture e‐commerce web site quality using an IS success model: system quality, information quality, service quality, and attractiveness. A questionnaire survey was conducted to verify the measures of web site quality. Based on TAM, a framework is also developed relating web site quality to customers' beliefs (perceived usefulness and ease of use), attitudes (preferences for the site), and intentions (to revisit the site). Findings: A set of instruments of web site quality has been developed and empirically validated by factor analysis. Research limitations/implications: The research is based on a sample of students browsing several book web sites and they may not sense the web site quality across different B2C commercial web sites such as music, computer, travel, clothes and flowers. Data in these domains should be collected in any future research to examine further the measures developed here. Practical implications: Guidelines for web interface design are proposed. Originality/value: This paper fulfils the identification of web site quality and the development and validation of its measures and offers a framework and practical guidelines for e‐commerce managers and web designers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/506724.506730 · Cited by 1,099
Profiling User Responses to Commercial Websites
Eighmey, J. (1997) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.1080/00218499.1997.12466673 · Cited by 458
Cited by
The role of atmospheric cues in online impulse-buying behavior.
Floh, A., & Madlberger, M. (2013) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2013.06.001 · Cited by 460
Consumer trust and distrust: An issue of website design
Ou, C. X., & Sia, C. L. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.08.003 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J.
- Venue
- Industrial Management & Data Systems
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 645-661
- ISSN
- 0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028900340
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 40.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: B2C e‐commerce web site quality: an empirical examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02635570510600000
- The paper
- Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J. (2005). B2C e‐commerce web site quality: an empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510600000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.