Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Successful Export Practice: The UK Experience

Styles, Chris, Ambler, Tim·1994·International Marketing Review

Abstract

Aims to update a previous study into the marketing practices of successful UK exporters. Finds that the majority of success factors identified over a decade ago are still valid today. In addition, finds some support for the emerging relational approach to export marketing. Concludes that exporters should place greater emphasis on relationship factors to improve their performance. Revises an earlier model of export performance as the basis for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02651339410072999

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Styles, C., & Ambler, T.
Venue
International Marketing Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1994-12-01
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
23-47
ISSN
0265-1335 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1505654009
Cited by
274
References
38
FWCI
13.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Successful Export Practice: The UK Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02651339410072999
The paper
Styles, C., & Ambler, T. (1994). Successful Export Practice: The UK Experience. International Marketing Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410072999

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.