The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non‐price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: an exploratory study
Abstract
Counterfeiting is a serious problem besetting an increasing number of industries. It affects not only products whose brand name is synonymous with its quality or flavour, but also products which require a high level of research and development, and marketing. Counterfeit merchandise cuts into profits and harms the brand owner′s reputation. To be effective in eradicating counterfeiting, one also has to understand the consumer′s propensity to purchase counterfeit products. Challenges the prevalent assumption that price is the main motive for purchasing counterfeit products. Offers conceptualizations of eight possible non‐price determinants of consumers′ behavioural intention towards the purchase of counterfeit products. Uses established scale development procedures to create multi‐item scales for these non‐price constructs. Explores the explanatory role of these constructs by relating them to purchase intention responses for four common counterfeit consumer products, through multiple regression analyses. A convenience survey of consumers in a South‐East Asian city with a pattern of use of counterfeit goods provides data for this study. Results suggest that non‐price determinants, particularly those relating to perceived product attributes and attitude towards counterfeiting, affect consumers′ intention to purchase counterfeit products. The type and magnitude of influence of these, however, differ across products as well as individuals. Discusses implications for branded goods marketers and policy makers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Kotler, P. T., & Armstrong, G. (1972) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 5,591
Bither, S. W., Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1971) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250571 · Cited by 2,795
Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World
Belk, R. W. (1985) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208515 · Cited by 1,966
Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study
Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379303000208 · Cited by 1,768
Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods
Roselius, T. (1971) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224297103500110 · Cited by 1,404
Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior
Blankertz, D. F., & Cox, D. F. (1969) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150012 · Cited by 1,397
The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers
Dickson, P. R., & Sawyer, A. G. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400304 · Cited by 1,117
Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review
McAlister, L., & Pessemier, E. (1982) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208926 · Cited by 999
Benefit Segmentation: A Decision-oriented Research Tool
Haley, R. I. (1968) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224296803200306 · Cited by 893
Cited by
Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence
Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.4.015 · Cited by 1,649
Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2011) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090561111095658 · Cited by 379
Understanding consumer ethical decision making with respect to purchase of pirated software
Tan, B. (2002) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760210420531 · Cited by 333
The emergence of counterfeit trade: a literature review
Staake, T., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E. (2009) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560910935451 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Wee, C., Ta, S., & Cheok, K.
- Venue
- International Marketing Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1995-12-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 19-46
- ISSN
- 0265-1335 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1506711429
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: an exploratory study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02651339510102949
- The paper
- Wee, C., Ta, S., & Cheok, K. (1995). Non‐price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: an exploratory study. International Marketing Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339510102949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.