The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emergence of counterfeit trade: a literature review
Abstract
Purpose: Trade in counterfeit goods is perceived as a substantial threat to various industries. No longer is the emergence of imitation products confined to branded luxury goods and final markets. Counterfeit articles are increasingly finding their way into other sectors, including the fast‐moving consumer goods, pharmaceutical, and automotive industries – with, in part, severe negative consequences for consumers, licit manufacturers, and brand owners alike. This paper seeks to shed light on the economic principles of counterfeit trade and the underlying illicit supply chains. Design/methodology/approach: An extensive literature review was conducted that comprised contributions from different strands of management research. Findings: Though governments as well as management have clearly identified the problem, very little is known – both in practice and theory – about the mechanisms and structure of the illicit market, the tactics of counterfeit producers, consumer behavior with respect to imitation products and the financial impact on individual companies. The diversity of the counterfeit phenomenon underlines the need for further research in this area and the development of company‐specific measures for fighting product piracy. Research limitations/implications: The clandestine nature of the counterfeit market limits direct accessibility to the phenomenon. Consequently, the existing body of literature does not necessarily cover all aspects of counterfeit activities. The review helps to highlight existing research gaps but may not be able to identify additional aspects of the phenomenon that, thus far, have not been deemed relevant. Originality/value: The paper critically reviews the current state of research across different management‐related disciplines. From an academic perspective it may serve as a starting point for a future research agenda that addresses the current knowledge gaps. From a practitioner's perspective it is helpful for understanding the relevant influence factors and for developing appropriate, state‐of‐the‐art counterstrategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chang, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1005721401993 · Cited by 852
Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy
Maskus, K. E. (2000) · Cited by 659
Software Piracy: An Analysis of Protection Strategies
Reavis Conner, K., & Rumelt, R. P. (1991) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.2.125 · Cited by 645
Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands?
Nia, A., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2000) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610420010351402 · Cited by 637
Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods
Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882643 · Cited by 633
Smarzynska Javorcik, B. (2004) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(02)00257-x · Cited by 552
Spot the difference: consumer responses towards counterfeits
Hoon Ang, S., Sim Cheng, P., Lim, E. A. C., & Kuan Tambyah, S. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760110392967 · Cited by 547
Software Piracy in the Workplace: A Model and Empirical Test
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045759 · Cited by 523
Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants
Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick, R. L. (1996) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00009-7 · Cited by 452
Non‐price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: an exploratory study
Wee, C., Ta, S., & Cheok, K. (1995) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651339510102949 · Cited by 400
Cited by
Effects of value and innovation on brand equity in retailing
Moliner-Velázquez, B., Fuentes-Blasco, M., & Gil-Saura, I. (2019) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-019-00159-5 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Staake, T., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-04-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3/4
- Pages
- 320-349
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969855336
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 39.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The emergence of counterfeit trade: a literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560910935451
- The paper
- Staake, T., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E. (2009). The emergence of counterfeit trade: a literature review. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910935451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.