Cited by 171Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesManagement Systems and Quality Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implementing TPM in plant maintenance: some organisational barriers

Lee Cooke, Fang·2000·International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

Abstract

Since the 1980s, quality initiatives, seen as critical for greater competitiveness, have gained much attention from British management under the influence of Japanese management principles. This has resulted in a widespread adoption of quality techniques such as quality circles, teamworking, customer care, total quality management (TQM) and total productive maintenance (TPM), etc. This paper reports the finding of a study of the production and maintenance function of four processing/manufacturing companies. It intends to highlight the difficulties that these companies have been faced with in their attempt to implement TPM initiatives between the production and maintenance departments in order to improve organisational efficiency. The paper concludes that implementing TPM is by no means an easy task, which is heavily burdened by political, financial, departmental and inter‐occupational barriers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02656710010378789

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bromley, D. (1986), The Case Study Method in Psychology and Related Disciplines, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  2. Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. (1977), Actors and System: the Politics of Collective Action, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  3. Dale, B. and Cooper, G. (1992), Total Quality and Human Resources: an Executive Guide, Blackwell, Oxford.
  4. Hutchins, D. (1998), “Introducing TPM’’, Manufacturing Engineer, February. · DOI
  5. Nakajima, S. (1988), Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
  6. Patterson, J., Kennedy, W. and Fredendall, L. (1995), “Total productive maintenance is not for this company”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, second quarter.
  7. Patterson, J., Fredenall, L., Kennedy, W. and McGee, A. (1996), “Adapting total productive maintenance to Asten, INC”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, fourth quarter.
  8. Riis, J., Luxhoj, J. and Thorsteinsson, U. (1997), “A situational maintenance model”, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 349‐66. · DOI
  9. Stoecker, R. (1991), “Evaluating and rethinking the case study”, Sociological Reviews, Vol. 3901, pp. 88‐112. · DOI
  10. Tajiri, M. and Gotoh, F. (1992), TPM Implementation: A Japanese Approach, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
  11. Upton, D.M. (1995), “What really makes factories flexible”, Harvard Business Review, July‐August: pp. 74‐84.
  12. Yin, R. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Lee Cooke, F.
Venue
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1003-1016
ISSN
0265-671X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082424573
Cited by
171
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 22
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
Keywords
total productive maintenance, TPM implementation, organizational barriers, plant maintenance, quality management, total quality management, manufacturing companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementing TPM in plant maintenance: some organisational barriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02656710010378789
The paper
Lee Cooke, F. (2000). Implementing TPM in plant maintenance: some organisational barriers. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710010378789