The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An exploratory study of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector
Abstract
Purpose: The paper seeks to obtain a better understanding of the extent to which service quality permeates within the Malaysian public service sector by drawing on management and customer perceptions of service quality. Design/methodology/approach: Two separate surveys were distributed to managers and customers across 86 branches of a public sector department within the Malaysian Ministry. The manager survey comprised instruments relating to organisational service performance, while the customer survey contained instruments relating to service quality and customer satisfaction. A total of 430 manager and customer surveys were completed, representing a 95 percent response rate. Findings: The results support the conceptual model in demonstrating a strong correlation between service quality dimensions, service performance and customer satisfaction. In particular, service providers classified as “excellent” were rated most favourably in terms of responsiveness, access and credibility. Research limitations/implications: The generalisability of the results is limited by the absence of the employees' perception of service quality. Practical implications: This research adds to the body of knowledge relating to public service quality management. Originality/value: The originality of this paper lies within the context in which this study took place. The study addresses key relationships between service dimensions, service performance and service quality within the Malaysian public service sector. Although previous research has addressed similar issues within the context of the public sector, relatively few studies pertain directly to Malaysian public services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252174 · Cited by 4,860
Cited by
The Impact of Service Quality on Customer Loyalty: A Study of Banks in Penang, Malaysia
Kheng, L. L., Mahamad, O., Ramayah, T., & Mosahab, R. (2010) · International Journal of Marketing Studies · doi:10.5539/ijms.v2n2p57 · Cited by 347
A Success Model for the Malaysian Government e-Procurement System: The Buyer Perspective
Kassim, E. S., & Hussin, H. (2013) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2013010101 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Agus, A., Barker, S., & Kandampully, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-02-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-190
- ISSN
- 0265-671X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6682
- OpenAlex
- W2048423883
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An exploratory study of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02656710710722284
- The paper
- Agus, A., Barker, S., & Kandampully, J. (2007). An exploratory study of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710722284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.