The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When person‐organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility
Abstract
Purpose: The present study examined the relationships between P‐O fit, job satisfaction, perceived job mobility, and intent to turnover. It was hypothesized that job satisfaction mediated the P‐O fit‐intent to turnover relationship and that perceived job mobility moderated the job satisfaction‐intent to turnover relationship such that the combined effect of high job dissatisfaction and high perceived job mobility predicted intent to turnover. Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained utilizing a field survey from a sample of 205 full‐time employed adults working in two geographic regions in the USA. Participants completed an HTML‐based web survey that contained measures of the constructs of interest to this study. Findings: Mediated and moderated regression analyses revealed statistical support for the hypothesized relationships, which were interpreted as evidence that P‐O misfit and job dissatisfaction do not necessarily lead to intent to turnover. Research limitations/implications: The potential for common method variability was present in the study, the impact of which could either attenuate or inflate estimated statistical relationships. Practical implications: While P‐O fit researchers typically associate misfit with decreased job satisfaction and increased turnover, the present research suggests that intervening variables, such as job mobility, influence employee intentions to turnover. Originality/value: The phenomenon of misfit is understudied in larger context of P‐O fit; thus this research represents one of the first studies in this area of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Cited by
The validation of the turnover intention scale
Bothma, C. F. C., & Roodt, G. (2013) · SA Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.507 · Cited by 570
Bowling, N. A., & Hammond, G. D. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004 · Cited by 411
Organizational career growth, affective occupational commitment and turnover intentions
Weng, Q., & McElroy, J. C. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.014 · Cited by 317
When ownership of the venture triggers cofounders’ unethical pro-venture behavior
Hong, M. C., Lin, H.-E., Hsu, D. K., & Shi, Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00255 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, A. R., Coleman Gallagher, V., Brouer, R. L., & Sablynski, C. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Managerial Psychology
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-02-20
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-219
- ISSN
- 0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1484446552
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When person‐organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02683940710726447
- The paper
- Wheeler, A. R., Coleman Gallagher, V., Brouer, R. L., & Sablynski, C. J. (2007). When person‐organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility. Journal of Managerial Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710726447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.