CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHigher Education and EmployabilityCultural Differences and Values

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The relationship between individual values and psychological contracts

Cohen, Aaron·2012·Journal of Managerial Psychology
DOI 10.1108/02683941211205826
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: This paper seeks to examine whether individual values are related to perceptions of psychological contracts and psychological contract breach when justice perceptions are taken into account. Design/methodology/approach: The study sample comprised staff employees of one of the largest banks in Israel. The sample included 311 employees in the head office of this bank. Data were collected from the employees over a period of about three months. Findings: The findings show a modest relationship between individual values and perceptions of a relational type of psychological contract. The findings show weaker relationships between the values, perceived transactional‐type contracts, and perceptions of contract breach. Research limitations/implications: The study relied upon a cross‐sectional design. Such a design consists of a single observation with no control groups, and so cannot be used to draw conclusions about causal relationships between the variables. In addition, the study examined only one professional group in one culture. Practical implications: The significant relationship between conservation and self‐transcendence values and perceptions of relational‐type contracts suggests that organizations should take this into account when making hiring and human resource (HR) management decisions. Originality/value: Few studies have examined how individual values relate to the type of psychological contract individuals perceive themselves involved in, or the way they perceive contract breach. Examining individual‐level values helps to elucidate the attitudes and behaviors of employees in the workplace.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/02683941211205826

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Baruch, Y. (1998), “The rise and fall of organizational commitment”, Human System Management, Vol. 17, pp. 135‐43. · DOI
  2. Berings, D., De Fruyt, F. and Bouwen, R. (2004), “Work values and personality traits as predictors of enterprising and social vocational interests”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 36, pp. 349‐64. · DOI
  3. Brooke, P.P., Russell, D.W. and Price, J.L. (1988), “Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement and organizational commitment”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 73, pp. 139‐45. · DOI
  4. Cohen, A. and Caspari, L. (2011), “Individual values, organizational commitment, and participation in a change: Israeli teachers' approach to an optional educational reform”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 385‐96. · DOI
  5. Colquitt, J.A. (2001), “On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, pp. 386‐400. · DOI
  6. Conway, N. and Briner, R.B. (2009), “Fifty years of psychological contract research: what do we know and what are the main challenges?”, in Hodgkinson, G.P. and Ford, J.K. (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 71‐130. · DOI
  7. Coyle‐Shapiro, J.A.M. (2002), “A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 927‐46. · DOI
  8. Coyle‐Shapiro, J.A.M. and Kessler, I. (2003), “The employment relationship in the UK public sector: a psychological contract perspective”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 13, pp. 213‐30. · DOI
  9. Coyle‐Shapiro, J.A.M. and Neuman, J.H. (2004), “The psychological contract and individual differences: the role of exchange and creditor ideologies”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 64, pp. 150‐64. · DOI
  10. Cropanzano, R. and Prehar, C.A. (2001), “Emerging justice concerns in an era of changing psychological contracts”, in Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 245‐69.
  11. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D.E., Mohler, C.J. and Schminke, M. (2001), “Three roads to organizational justice”, in Ferris, J. (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 20, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 1‐113. · DOI
  12. Dulac, T., Coyle‐Shapiro, J.A‐M., Henderson, D. and Wayne, S. (2008), “Not all responses to breach are the same: a longitudinal study examining the interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 51, pp. 1079‐98. · DOI
  13. Fischer, R. and Smith, P.B. (2006), “Who cares about justice? The moderating effect of values on the link between organizational justice and work behavior”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 55, pp. 541‐62. · DOI
  14. Fontaine, J.R.J., Poortinga, Y.H., Delbeke, L. and Schwartz, S.H. (2008), “Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: distinguishing sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation”, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, Vol. 39, pp. 345‐65. · DOI
  15. Francesco, A.N. and Chen, Z.X. (2004), “Collectivism in action: its moderating effects on the relationship between organizational commitment and employee performance in China”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 29, pp. 425‐41. · DOI
  16. Gelfand, M.J., Erez, M. and Aycan, Z. (2007), “Cross‐cultural organizational behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 58, pp. 479‐514. · DOI
  17. Glazer, S., Daniel, S.K. and Short, K.M. (2004), “A study of the relationship between organizational commitment and human values in four countries”, Human Relations, Vol. 57, pp. 323‐45. · DOI
  18. Greenberg, J. (1990), “Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow”, Journal of Management, Vol. 16, pp. 399‐432. · DOI
  19. Harman, H. (1967), Modern Factor Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  20. Ho, V.T., Weingart, L.R. and Rousseau, D.M. (2004), “Responses to broken promises: does personality matter”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 65, pp. 276‐93. · DOI
  21. Hui, C., Lee, C. and Rousseau, D.M. (2004), “Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: investigating generalizability and instrumentality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 311‐21. · DOI
  22. Lam, S.K.S., Schaubroeck, J. and Aryee, S. (2002), “Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross‐national study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 1‐18. · DOI
  23. Liau‐Troth, M.A. (2005), “Are they here for the long haul? The effects of functional motives and personality factors on the psychological contracts of volunteers”, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 34, pp. 510‐30. · DOI
  24. Liu, Y. and Cohen, A. (2010), “Values, commitment, and OCB among Chinese employees”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 34, pp. 493‐506. · DOI
  25. Mathieu, J.E. and Farr, J.L. (1991), “Further evidence of the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 127‐33. · DOI
  26. Millward, L.J. and Hopkins, L.J. (1998), “Psychological contracts, organizational and job commitment”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 28, pp. 1530‐56. · DOI
  27. Moorman, R.H. (1991), “Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 845‐55. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Niehoff, P.B. and Moorman, H.R. (1993), “Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 527‐56. · DOI
  29. O'Donohue, W. and Nelson, L. (2009), “The role of ethical values in an expanded psychological contract”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 90, pp. 251‐63. · DOI
  30. Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D. (1986), “Self‐reports in organizational research: problems and prospects”, Journal of Management, Vol. 12, pp. 531‐44. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Raja, U., Johns, G. and Ntalianis, F. (2004), “The impact of personality on psychological contracts”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, pp. 350‐67. · DOI
  32. Robinson, S.L. and Morrison, E.W. (2000), “The development of psychological contract breach: a longitudinal study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp. 525‐46. · DOI
  33. Roe, R.A. and Ester, P. (1999), “Values and work: empirical findings and theoretical perspective”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 48, pp. 1‐21. · DOI
  34. Rousseau, D.M. (1995), Psychological Contracts in Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  35. Rousseau, D.M. and Schalk, R. (2000), Psychological Contracts in Employment: Cross‐national Perspectives, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. · DOI
  36. Schwartz, S.H. (1992), “Universals in the content and structure of values: theory and empirical tests in 20 countries”, in Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 1‐65. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Schwartz, S.H. (1996), “Value priorities and behavior: applying a theory of integrated value systems”, in Seligman, C., Olsen, J.M. and Zanna, M.P. (Eds), Values: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 8, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1‐25.
  38. Schwartz, S.H. (1999), “A theory of cultural values and some implications for work”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 48, pp. 23‐47. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schwartz, S.H. (2005), “Robustness and fruitfulness of a theory on universals in individual human values”, in Tamayo, A. and Porto, J.B. (Eds), Valores e comportamento nas organizações (Values and Behavior in Organizations), Vozes, Petrópolis, pp. 56‐95.
  40. Schwartz, S.H. and Bardi, A. (2001), “Value hierarchies across cultures: taking a similarities perspective”, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, Vol. 32, pp. 268‐90. · DOI
  41. Schwartz, S.H. and Sagiv, L. (1995), “Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values”, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 92‐116. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Schwartz, S.H., Sagiv, L. and Boehnke, K. (2000), “Worries and values”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 68, pp. 309‐46. · DOI
  43. Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S. and Harris, M. (2001), “Extending the cross‐cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement”, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, Vol. 32, pp. 519‐42. · DOI
  44. Suazo, M.M. and Turnley, W.H. (2010), “Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relations between individual differences and psychological contract breach”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 620‐48. · DOI
  45. Suazo, M.M., Martinez, P.G. and Sandoval, R. (2009), “Creating psychological and legal contracts through human resource practices: a signaling theory perspective”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 19, pp. 154‐66. · DOI
  46. Tallman, R.R.J. and Bruning, N.S. (2008), “Relating employees' psychological contracts to their personality”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 23, pp. 688‐712. · DOI
  47. Tekleab, A.G., Takeuchi, R. and Taylor, M.S. (2005), “Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: the role of contract violations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, pp. 146‐57. · DOI
  48. Thomas, D.C., Au, K. and Ravlin, E.C. (2003), “Cultural variation and the psychological contract”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24, pp. 451‐71. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Rousseau, D.M. (2001), “Schema, promise and mutuality: the building blocks of the psychological contract”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 74, pp. 511‐41. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, A.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Aaron
ORCID
Cohen, Aaron
Venue
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2012-03-24
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
283-301
ISSN
0268-3946 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/02683941211205826
OpenAlex
W2119529769
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Managerial Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
personal values, psychological contract, psychological contract breach, perceived justice, conservation value, self-transcendence values, relational psychological contract, transactional psychological contract, bank employees, human resource management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review