Regulatory audit functions and auditor‐contractor relationships
Abstract
Government contractors operate under circumstances unmatched in the commercial marketplace. A significant factor for conducting business in that environment is the use of heavy regulations. Government regulations for defence contractors include such procurement requirements as cost accounting standards, cost limitations and cost exclusions as outlined in the Defense Contract Audit Manual, Federal Acquisitions Regulations and Defense Acquisition Regulations. Defense Contract Audit Agency auditors must perform all necessary audits and ascertain contractor compliance with these standards as part of their internal control review. While contractors maintain costly accounting systems for the sole purpose of reporting to the Government, frequently adverse audit opinions are presented resulting in adversarial relationship between the two parties. First, addresses some of the most significant issues that lead to the development of conflict between the Goverment auditors and contractors, then provides some recommendations which are expected to reduce tension and increase efficiency of audit operations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DCAA audits tend to be broader and focus on account balances and cost elements that pertain to the contract in much greater detail than external auditor audits.
“DCAA audits tend to be broader and focus on account balances and cost elements that pertain to the contract in much greater detail (Ahadiat and Ehrenreich, 1996).”
From Government Procurement and Changes in Firm Transparency (2021) · cites this paper as Ahadiat and Ehrenreich, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Government Procurement and Changes in Firm Transparency
Samuels, D. (2021) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-2018-0343 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ahadiat, N., & Ehrenreich, K.
- Affiliations
- California State Polytechnic University (US)
- Venue
- Managerial Auditing Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4-10
- ISSN
- 0268-6902 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998002482
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Managerial Auditing Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Financial Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Keywords
- public procurement, defense contractors, regulatory audits, Defense Contract Audit Agency, Federal Acquisition Regulation, cost accounting standards, internal control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review