The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negative symbolic consumption and consumers’ drive for self‐esteem: The case of the fashion industry
Abstract
Self‐esteem is an important motivational drive for consumption involving both the acceptance and rejection/avoidance of symbolic goods. This paper examines the relationship between self‐esteem and the rejection of goods and brands within the context of fashion consumption by young professionals. A conceptualisation which accounts for consumers’ use of various strategies in their efforts to maintain or enhance their self‐esteem is suggested. A small‐scale exploratory study is used to examine first, how consumers invest products and brands with negative symbolic meanings; and second, how this leads consumers to reject products and brands. The importance of understanding negative symbolic consumption when marketing high involvement products such as fashion goods is identified; and the implications for fashion retailers and marketing management are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Green, M. L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1194 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour
Johnstone, M.-L., & Tan, L. P. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3 · Cited by 413
Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/653087 · Cited by 350
Bharti, M., Suneja, V., & Bharti, M. (2022) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111215 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Banister, E. N., & Hogg, M. K.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 850-868
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1602076286
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.