The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer empowerment: a Foucauldian interpretation
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to question the taken for granted assumptions that underpin a liberal or lay view of consumer empowerment implicit to this special edition. In particular, the idea that it benefits consumers to have more choice is questioned. Design/methodology/approach - The key constructs of Michel Foucault - disciplinary power, governmentality and technologies of self - are used to argue that people can never escape from the operation of power. Rather it is shown how power operates to produce consumers. Findings - The liberal view of the empowerment of consumers through choice is questioned. Rather we suggest the opposite; that choice is a disciplinary power and that more and more choice can lead to choice paralysis. The contemporary phenomenon known as blogging is described as a Foucauldian technology of self. Managerial implications are discussed. Originality/value - The value of a Foucauldian inspired theory of empowerment is that it represents a more sophisticated understanding of the fluidity of power relationships between producers and consumers than can be captured by a liberal view of power and empowerment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index
Diener, E. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.34 · Cited by 7,121
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.9.954 · Cited by 5,806
When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995 · Cited by 2,878
Inventing our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood
Rose, N. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511752179 · Cited by 2,809
Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom.
Schwartz, B. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.79 · Cited by 875
Cited by
Consumer Empowerment Through Internet-Based Co-creation
Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., & Jawecki, G. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260303 · Cited by 710
The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes
Naidoo, R., Shankar, A., & Veer, E. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2011.609135 · Cited by 221
Self-citationMoralities in food and health research
Askegaard, S., Ordabayeva, N., Chandon, P., Cheung, T., Chytkova, Z., Cornil, Y., Corus, C., Edell, J. A., Mathras, D., Junghans, A. F., et al. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2014.959034 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Shankar, A., Cherrier, H., & Canniford, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9/10
- Pages
- 1013-1030
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070446868
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer empowerment: a Foucauldian interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560610680989
- The paper
- Shankar, A., Cherrier, H., & Canniford, R. (2006). Consumer empowerment: a Foucauldian interpretation. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610680989
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.