The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context
Abstract
Purpose: This review article aims to develop an integrating overview of the present status of the theory of corporate social responsibility (CSR) applied in the marketing context and asks whether, to what extent and how the discipline of marketing has addressed CSR. Design/methodology/approach: After clarifying core concepts and proposing a new definition of CSR, 54 articles in leading marketing journals between 1995 and 2005 are analyzed in terms of publication characteristics, research design, variables, sampling, level of analysis, issues raised, and key findings. Findings: Recommendations include a broadened perspective in empirical research to address CSR in its entirety, expand the focus beyond consumers, include a broader range of samples and conduct more inductive, exploratory empirical studies. These steps will contribute to a multidimensional view of the future customer. Research limitations/implications: The number and specific choice of journals was subject to a compromise between comprehensiveness and the availability of space for a review. Practical implications: The way the scholarly marketing literature treats CSR impacts what our students and other constituencies learn. Originality/value: Given the veritable explosion in CSR research in the recent years, there is a genuine need for the field to take stock of what has been learned so far and what that implies in terms of where researchers should be headed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028831 · Cited by 1,069
Building Understanding of the Domain of Consumer Vulnerability
Baker, S. M., Gentry, J. W., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2005) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146705280622 · Cited by 895
Social contracts and marketing ethics
Dunfee, T. W., Smith, N. C., & Ross, W. T. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300302 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Homburg, C., Stierl, M., & Bornemann, T. (2013) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.12.0089 · Cited by 427
Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges
Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12196 · Cited by 418
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaaland, T. I., Heide, M., & Grønhaug, K.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-09-19
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9/10
- Pages
- 927-953
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019442501
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090560810891082
- The paper
- Vaaland, T. I., Heide, M., & Grønhaug, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810891082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.