The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer Satisfaction during the Service Delivery Process
Abstract
Prior studies of how service quality evolves during the service delivery process have used aggregate case data in retrospect or have not obtained objective measures of the actual dimensions of the service encounter on an individual basis. Reports on a study of an actual hotel service delivery process partitioned into five distinct service encounters; check‐in, the room, the restaurant, the breakfast and check‐out. The aim was to investigate how quality factors were related to their respective encounters and how cumulative satisfaction levels impact on each other and over time. Average satisfaction levels for each of the five encounters were found to be significantly different. Moreover, there was a clear trend in the cumulative satisfaction results. Check‐in resulted in high satisfaction, the room was not so satisfying and the restaurant rated the worst. Satisfaction scores rose after the breakfast experience and rose again after check‐out. A factor analysis of all the questions, for a hypothesized five‐factor solution, explained 78 per cent of the variation. All the first four encounters loaded highly and collectively on four distinct factors. The fifth factor largely comprised correct check‐in booking and a correct bill on check‐out. Finally, a logistic regression model was used to rank the importance of the quality factors on their respective encounters. This information can be used to assist with the quality improvement of each encounter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents
Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252174 · Cited by 4,860
Cited by
The concept of perceived value: a systematic review of the research
Sánchez-Fernández, R., & Iniesta-Bonillo, M. Á. (2007) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593107083165 · Cited by 1,269
Patterson, P. G., Cowley, E., & Prasongsukarn, K. (2006) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.004 · Cited by 525
Chen, P.-T., & Hu, H.-H. (2010) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.09.006 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Danaher, P. J., & Mattsson, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1994-05-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5-16
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015247717
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customer Satisfaction during the Service Delivery Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090569410062005
- The paper
- Danaher, P. J., & Mattsson, J. (1994). Customer Satisfaction during the Service Delivery Process. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569410062005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.