Cited by 170International Business and FDIInnovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global strategy: a review and an integrated conceptual framework

Zou, Shaoming, Tamer Cavusgil, S.·1996·European Journal of Marketing

Abstract

A review of the literature reveals that global strategy is characterized by diverse perspectives and lack of a unified theory. Identifies gaps in the literature as the contributors to its current state: lack of integration of the diverse perspectives and domination by the industrial organization (IO) theoretical view. Attempts to integrate the diverse perspectives of global strategy into a six‐dimension global strategy construct, and to integrate the IO‐based theory with the resource‐based theory of strategy and competitive advantage. Presents an integrated conceptual framework of global strategy which helps reduce the ambiguity and confusion in the global strategy literature, and that serves as a theoretical foundation for future research. Discusses the managerial implications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/03090569610105799

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Arogyaswamy, B. and Byles, C.M. 1987, “Organizational culture: internal and external fits”, Journal of Management, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 647‐59. · DOI
  2. Bain, J.S. 1951, “Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing 1936‐1940”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 65, August, pp. 293‐324. · DOI
  3. Bain, J.S. 1956, Barriers to Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI
  4. Barney, J. 1986, “Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11 , July, pp. 656‐65. · DOI
  5. Barney, J. 1989, “Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: a comment”, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 12, pp. 1511‐13. · DOI
  6. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. 1988, “Organizing for worldwide effectiveness: the transnational solution”, California Management Review, Autumn, pp. 54‐74. · DOI
  7. Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. 1991, “Global strategic management: impact on the new frontiers of strategy research”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 5‐16. · DOI
  8. Bharadwaj, S.G., Varadarajan, P.R. and Fahy, J. 1993, “Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 4, pp. 83‐99. · DOI
  9. Cavusgil, S.T. and Zou, S. 1994, “Marketing strategy‐performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 1‐21. · DOI
  10. Chandler, A.D. 1962, Strategy and Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  11. Collis, D.J. 1991, “A resource‐based analysis of global competition: the case of the bearings industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 49‐68. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Conner, K.R. 1991, “A historical comparison of resource‐based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, March, pp. 121‐54. · DOI
  13. Douglas, S.P. and Craig, C.S. 1989, “Evolution of global marketing strategy: scale, scope, and synergy”, Columbia Journal of World Business, Autumn, pp. 47‐58.
  14. Douglas, S.P. and Wind, Y. 1987, “The myth of globalization”, Columbia Journal of World Business, Winter, pp. 19‐29.
  15. Ghoshal, S. 1987, “Global strategy: an organizing framework, ” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 425‐40. · DOI
  16. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. 1983, “Managing strategic responsibility in the MNC”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 341‐51. · DOI
  17. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. 1985, “Do you really have a global strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, July‐August, pp. 139‐48.
  18. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. 1989, “Strategic intent”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67, May‐June, pp. 63‐76.
  19. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. 1976, “Population ecology”, American Sociology Review, No. 49, pp. 149‐64. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hax, A.C. 1989, “Building the firm of the future”, Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 75‐82.
  21. Hout, T., Porter, M.E. and Rudden, E. 1982, “How global companies win out”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60, September‐October, pp. 98‐105.
  22. Jain, S.C. 1989, “Standardization of international strategy: some research hypotheses”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 70‐9. · DOI
  23. Jaworski, B.J. and Kohli, A.K. 1993, “Market orientation: antecedents and consequences”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 53‐70. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kim, W.C. and Hwang, P. 1992, “Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice”, Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter, pp. 29‐53. · DOI
  25. Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R.A. 1991, “Implementing global strategies: the role of procedural justice”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 125‐43. · DOI
  26. Kogut, B. 1985, “Designing global strategies: comparative and competitive value added chains”, Sloan Management Review, Autumn, pp. 27‐38.
  27. Kohli, A.K. and Jaworski, B.J. 1990, “Market orientation: the constructs, research propositions, and managerial implications”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 1‐18. · DOI
  28. Kotter, J.P. and Heskett, J.L. 1992, Corporate Culture and Performance, Free Press, New York, NY.
  29. Lado, A.A., Boyd, N.G. and Wright, P. 1992, “A competency‐based model of sustainable competitive advantage: toward a conceptual integration”, Journal of Management, Vol. 18, March, pp. 77‐91. · DOI
  30. Levitt, T. 1983, “The globalization of markets”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 61, May‐June, pp. 92‐102.
  31. Lusch, R.F. and Laczniak, G.R. 1987, “The evolving marketing concept, competitive intensity and organizational performance”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 15, Autumn, pp. 1‐11. · DOI
  32. Mahoney, J.T. and Pandian, R. 1992, “The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, June, pp. 363‐80. · DOI
  33. Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. 1990, “The effect of a market orientation on business profitability”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, October, pp. 20‐35. · DOI
  34. Ohmae, K. 1985, Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition, Free Press, New York, NY.
  35. Ohmae, K. 1989, “Managing in a borderless world”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67, May‐June, pp. 152‐61.
  36. Perlmutter, H.V. 1969, “The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation”, Columbia Journal of World Business, January‐February, pp. 9‐18.
  37. Porter, M.E. 1980, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York, NY.
  38. Porter, M.E. 1981, “The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, pp. 609‐20. · DOI
  39. Porter, M.E. 1985, Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, NY.
  40. Porter, M.E. 1986, “Competition in global industries: a conceptual framework”, in Porter, M.E. (Ed.), Competition in Global Industries, Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 15‐60.
  41. Porter, M.E. 1991, “Toward a dynamic theory of strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 95‐117. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. 1990, “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, May‐June, pp. 71‐91.
  43. Quelch, J.A. and Hoff, E.J. 1986, “Customizing global marketing”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 64, May‐June, pp. 59‐68.
  44. Rumelt, R.P. 1974, Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  45. Rumelt, R.P. 1984, “Toward a strategic theory of the firm”, in Teece, D.J. (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 137‐58.
  46. Samiee, S. and Roth, K. 1992, “The influence of global marketing standardization on performance”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56 No. 2, pp. 1‐17. · DOI
  47. Tallman, S.B. 1991, “Strategic management models and resource‐based strategies among MNEs in a host market”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, Summer, pp. 69‐82. · DOI
  48. Venkatraman, N. and Prescott, J.E. 1990, “Environment‐strategy coalignment: an empirical test of its performance implications”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 1‐23. · DOI
  49. Wernerfelt, B. 1984, “A resource‐based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 171‐80. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Wernerfelt, B. 1989, “From critical resources to corporate strategy”, Journal of General Management, Vol. 14, pp. 4‐12. · DOI
  51. Winter, S.G. 1987, “Knowledge and competence as strategic assets”, in Teece, D.J. (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 159‐84.
  52. Yip, G.S. 1989, “Global strategy … in a world of nations?”, Sloan Management Review, Autumn, pp. 29‐41.

Metadata

Authors
Zou, S., & Tamer Cavusgil, S.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Venue
European Journal of Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
52-69
ISSN
0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986317015
Cited by
170
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
global strategy, conceptual framework, industrial organization theory, resource-based view, competitive advantage, strategic management, international business strategy, theoretical integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global strategy: a review and an integrated conceptual framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090569610105799
The paper
Zou, S., & Tamer Cavusgil, S. (1996). Global strategy: a review and an integrated conceptual framework. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610105799