The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The customer as co‐producer
Open accessAbstract
Buyer‐seller interaction in industrial markets is a widely applied work logic, which has been thoroughly researched both empirically and theoretically. Addresses, in contrast,the interactive way of working in consumer markets, which is referred to increasingly under the heading of “customer co‐production”. Results indicate that company‐consumer interaction is becoming more frequent in a wide range of consumer industries, but in contrast to such interaction in industrial markets it generally encompasses only one or two of the value‐creating activities of design, production or consumption, and the benefits are mostly short‐term: a better fit for the consumers and the advantage of more differentiated offerings for the companies. However, the strategic benefits of learning that enhance the innovative capability of the producers and add to the competence of the users, still seem limited. One reason for this may be lack of channels for feedback, since it is the front‐line staff who interact with the consumers. Also, they lack the authority and competence for undertaking the feedback role. A growing population of advanced consumers, flexible production modes and the widespread application of information technology all help to create a potential for this logic, but in order to exploit its benefits to the full, more knowledge is needed about how to organize the interaction with a view to learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 1×
“Another strength is that the model has been developed and tested in an environment - the IMP research group in Uppsala - which is widely recognized for its front-line research in industrial buyer-seller relations[ 1”
Method
Cited by
Comfort Your Online Customer: Quality, Trust and Loyalty on the Internet
Ribbink, D., van Riel, A. C. R., Liljander, V., & Streukens, S. (2004) · Managing Service Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/09604520410569784 · Cited by 872
Managing Co-creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation
Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & Storbacka, K. (2015) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12087 · Cited by 518
Bell, S. J. (2005) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304269111 · Cited by 490
Zatori, A., Smith, M. K., & Puczko, L. (2018) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.013 · Cited by 388
From Cattle and Coke to Charlie: Meeting the Challenge of Self Marketing and Personal Branding
Shepherd, I. D. H. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1362/0267257054307381 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Wikström, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 6-19
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990286931
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The customer as co‐producer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/03090569610118803
- The paper
- Wikström, S. (1996). The customer as co‐producer. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610118803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.