The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market
Abstract
This paper presents an interpretive study of older consumers and their potential for ethical consumption. Although latterly marketers are recognising the value of older consumers, research has not yet examined their attitudes and behaviour towards ethical consumption. From the collection of individual interviews conducted for this study, it would seem that older people share a sense of moral responsibility in their purchase behaviour, and as a community are willing to engage in affirmative purchasing and boycotting. Although there are perceived barriers to their participation in broader ethical purchasing activities, they would appear to be a potentially significant force in the consumer resistance movement. The findings suggest that as a group, older consumers should be considered as an important target market for ethical marketers who wish to benefit from their collective sense of social obligation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude—behaviour gap
Boulstridge, E., & Carrigan, M. (2000) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/eb023532 · Cited by 559
Self-citation
Cited by
Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions
Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9287-y · Cited by 665
Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food
Zander, K., & Hamm, U. (2010) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.01.006 · Cited by 388
Consumption as voting: an exploration of consumer empowerment
Shaw, D., Newholm, T., & Dickinson, R. (2006) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560610681005 · Cited by 386
Kushwah, S., Dhir, A., & Sagar, M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.350 · Cited by 302
Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation
Sudbury-Riley, L., & Kohlbacher, F. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.005 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrigan, M., Szmigin, I., & Wright, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 401-417
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093208234
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/07363760410558672
- The paper
- Carrigan, M., Szmigin, I., & Wright, J. (2004). Shopping for a better world? An interpretive study of the potential for ethical consumption within the older market. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760410558672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.