The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: the influence of consumption situation
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the influence of consumption situation on the use of extrinsic cues, such as price and expert opinion, in the assessment of different types of risk associated to purchase decisions. Design/methodology/approach: An experimental design was conducted in a sample of 128 postgraduate students, using red wine as product category. The experiment manipulated consumption situation, price, and expert opinion about the product. Different types of risks associated with the purchase decision and purchase intention were then measured. Findings: Results suggest that consumption situation affects the use of price in the assessment of performance risk, but only in the case of negative expert opinion about the products. Additionally, expert opinion demonstrated to have a strong effect reducing performance risk and increasing intention to buy. Research limitations/implications: The main limitations of the present research are associated with the exploratory and inconclusive characteristic of the performed mediation tests, and the use of just one product category in the research. Future research should replicate the study in other product categories and include other types of extrinsic cues. Practical implications: Managers should consider the complex effects of price on the assessment of risks related with a purchase, and the effect of consumption situation on the process. In addition, managers should use positive expert opinions in advertising and point‐of‐purchase material. Originality/value: The study analyzes the influence of consumption situation on consumers' use of different extrinsic cues to assess risks associated with the purchase of uncertain quality products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models
Mitchell, V. (1999) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569910249229 · Cited by 1,582
Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline
Stone, R. N., & Grønhaug, K. (1993) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569310026637 · Cited by 1,348
Perceived risk: The concept and its measurement
Dowling, G. R. (1986) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.4220030307 · Cited by 551
Cited by
Lin, P.-C., & Huang, Y.-H. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.002 · Cited by 854
Mohd Suki, N. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.087 · Cited by 377
Bues, M., Steiner, M., Stafflage, M., & Krafft, M. (2017) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20981 · Cited by 110
A Concept of Location-Based Social Network Marketing
Tussyadiah, I. P. (2012) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2012.666168 · Cited by 76
Caputo, V., Scarpa, R., Nayga, R. M., & Ortega, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Choice Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2018.04.003 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Aqueveque, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 237-247
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054585628
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: the influence of consumption situation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/07363760610681646
- The paper
- Aqueveque, C. (2006). Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: the influence of consumption situation. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610681646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.