The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers?
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Research examining corporate social responsibility (CSR) demonstrates a relatively consistent level of positive support by consumers. However, CSR is poorly defined and little is known about the mechanisms by which this response occurs. This paper seeks to understand how consumers define CSR and how it can enhance the overall value proposition for consumers. Design/methodology/approach: The value typology developed by Sheth et al. is integrated with qualitative data to enhance understanding of these value paths. Interviews were conducted with consumers through the heart of the current recession, when consumers were particularly aware of value when making purchase decisions. Findings: The way in which CSR manifests itself determines consumer support. CSR can provide three forms of value to consumers: emotional, social, and functional. Each of these enhances or diminishes the overall value proposition for consumers. Further, value created by one form of CSR can either enhance or diminish other product attributes. Practical implications: The current research helps managers understand how CSR can create value for consumers. As a result, managers can better position products in order to enhance overall value. Further, practitioners can match the value with which consumers identify from CSR to the dominant value driver in their product category. Originality/value: This study highlights that CSR includes a range of activities with differential means of adding value to consumers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/586910 · Cited by 3,409 · cited 1×
“By being seen as someone who cares for the environment, a consumer can ensure they meet social norms and community standards that reinforce such behavior (Goldstein et al., 2008).”
BackgroundTargeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000006155 · Cited by 2,974
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198 · Cited by 962
Cited by
Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764012450777 · Cited by 678
Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., & Ishizaka, A. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1555342 · Cited by 135
Consumers’ categorization of eco-friendly consumer goods: An integrative review and research agenda
Larranaga, A., & Valor, C. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.005 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, T., & Peloza, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-01-25
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-56
- ISSN
- 0736-3761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013079059
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 66.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/07363761111101949
- The paper
- Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2011). How does corporate social responsibility create value for consumers? Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761111101949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.