The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why consumers use and do not use technology‐enabled services
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to report on and discuss findings of a research study undertaken to investigate and establish empirically reasons why people use, or choose not to use, three types of technology‐enabled service: internet banking, telephone bill‐paying, and internet shopping services. Design/methodology/approach: A behavioural model is developed and tested, and the results support what is modelled and hypothesised. Findings: In sum, the findings show that willingness to use the internet and telephone for financial and shopping services is influenced by the individual sense of personal capacity or capability to engage with these service systems, the perceived risks and relative advantages associated with their use, and the extent to which contact with service personnel is preferred or deemed necessary. The paper also contains attitudinal and behavioural insights, and concludes by discussing managerial implications and opportunities for further research. Research limitations/implications: Limitations of the study are acknowledged, and opportunities for further research are highlighted. Originality/value: The value of the paper lies in the light shed on usage behaviour and attitudes, and in the practical implications of these findings for service providers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 1×
“eliminates the need for personal contact and interaction – with service personnel and other customers – and because they find it enjoyable (Curran et al., 2003; Dabholkar and Bagozzi, 2002; Polatoglu and Ekin, 2001; Sathye, 1999; Davis et al., 1992).”
BackgroundAgarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302303001 · Cited by 1,898
A Framework for Customer Relationship Management
Winer, R. S. (2001) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166102 · Cited by 868
Cited by
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Algharabat, R. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026 · Cited by 576
Predicting the intentions to use chatbots for travel and tourism
Melián-González, S., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., & Bulchand-Gidumal, J. (2021) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2019.1706457 · Cited by 406
Adopters and non-adopters of Internet banking: A segmentation study
Patsiotis, A. G., Hughes, T., & Webber, D. J. (2012) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321211195686 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, R. H., & Johnson, L. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Services Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-135
- ISSN
- 0887-6045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026169005
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why consumers use and do not use technology‐enabled services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/08876040610657057
- The paper
- Walker, R. H., & Johnson, L. W. (2006). Why consumers use and do not use technology‐enabled services. Journal of Services Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610657057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.