The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why consumers are not using internet banking: a qualitative study
Abstract
Purpose: This paper illustrates why consumers are resistant to using internet banking. Design/methodology/approach: A survey was used to acquire data from 127 consumers who were not internet bank users. Findings: Using a content analysis procedure, eight factors were identified which explain why consumers are not using internet banking. In order of frequency, the factors are: perceptions about risk; the need; lacking knowledge; inertia; inaccessibility; human touch; pricing and IT fatigue. Research limitations/implications: A list of those consumers who were not internet banking users could not be sourced, meaning that a random sample could not be carried out. The factors which emerged, however, appear to provide a comprehensive understanding of why certain consumers are not internet banking users. The factors provide a useful basis for researchers to conduct studies to better understand what influences a consumer decision not to use the internet as a means of sourcing banking services. Practical implications: The findings provide a framework for creating a strategy to enhance adoption rates. Originality/value: The findings create an awareness of the various reasons explaining why consumers are not becoming internet banking users. The various reasons provide scholars with an opportunity to conduct further research in this area and practitioners with an opportunity to enhance adoption rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parasuraman, A. (2000) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050024001 · Cited by 3,328
Cited by
Online shopping drivers and barriers for older adults: Age and gender differences
Lian, J.-W., & Yen, D. C. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.028 · Cited by 660
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Algharabat, R. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026 · Cited by 576
Kesharwani, A., & Singh Bisht, S. (2012) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321211236923 · Cited by 517
What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model
Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2019-1318 · Cited by 433
Khan, A. N., Jabeen, F., Mehmood, K., Ali Soomro, M., & Bresciani, S. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114019 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerrard, P., Barton Cunningham, J., & Devlin, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Services Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 160-168
- ISSN
- 0887-6045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083922054
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why consumers are not using internet banking: a qualitative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/08876040610665616
- The paper
- Gerrard, P., Barton Cunningham, J., & Devlin, J. F. (2006). Why consumers are not using internet banking: a qualitative study. Journal of Services Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040610665616
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.